ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Sex Differences in Prognosis of Heart Failure Due to Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Silent Shift of Menopause: The Intersection between Salivary Glands, Oral Cavity Status, and Cardiovascular Health.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026Review
- Sex-Specific Differences in Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.Korean circulation journal · 2025Article
- Impact of immigration on outcomes following acute decompensated heart failure: A retrospective cohort study.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Sex differences of visceral fat with cardiac structure and function in type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study.Journal of diabetes · 2024Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Ginsenoside Rb1-PLGA Nanoparticles for Heart Failure Treatment via the ROS/PPARα/PGC1α Pathway.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Trends and disparities in heart failure and heart failure with obesity mortality among U.S. adults: A 1999-2020 analysis of geographic, gender, and racial variations using CDC WONDER data.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited research has explored sex-specific differences in death predictors of HF patients with ischemic (iCMP) and nonischemic (niCMP) cardiomyopathy. This study assessed sex differences in niCMP and iCMP prognosis.
methodsWe studied 7487 patients with HF between February 2017 and September 2020. Clinical features and echocardiographic findings were collected. We used Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazard models, and chi-square scores of Cox regression to determine death predictors in women and men.
resultsThe mean age was 64.3 ± 14.2 years, with 4417 (59%) males. Women with iCMP and niCMP exhibited a significantly higher mean age, higher mean left ventricular ejection fraction, and smaller left ventricular diastolic diameter than men. Over 2.26 years of follow-up, 325 (14.7%) women and 420 (15.7%) men, and 211 women (24.5%) and 519 men (29.8%) with niCMP (
conclusionsWomen exhibited a better prognosis than men with iCMP, but similar for niCMP. Nevertheless, sex was not an independent predictor of death for both CMP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.