ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
The Impact of Nitroglycerin on the Evaluation of Coronary Stenosis in Coronary-CT: Preliminary Study in 131 Patients.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe sublingual administration of short-acting nitroglycerin (NTG) before coronary computed tomography (CCT) improves the visualization of coronary arteries, causing vasodilatation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether and how nitroglycerin can influence the concordance between radiologists and cardiologists in the evaluation of vessel stenosis measured in CCT by the former and during the following coronarography by the latter.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 131 patients who underwent CCT for cardiac symptoms in 2022, followed by coronarography performed six months later because of significant stenosis revealed by the CCT. First, the patients were divided into two groups: an NTG group who received sublingual nitroglycerin before CCT and a non-NTG group who did not because of contraindications. Second, 254 stenoses were measured by two radiologists after CCT and by two interventional cardiologists during the next coronarography; moreover, stenoses were classified on the basis of their location and plaque pattern (calcific, mixed and lipidic). Third, the strength of agreement was evaluated between the two radiologists, between the two cardiologists and finally between the radiologists and cardiologists in order to evaluate whether and how the interdisciplinary discrepancy in stenosis evaluation could change with or without the use of nitroglycerin before CCT and in relation to the different plaque pattern.
resultsIn the NTG group, the use of nitroglycerine reduced the agreement between radiologists and cardiologists in calcific stenosis but did not change the concordance in the case of mixed or lipidic plaques on the same vessels.
conclusionsThe use of sublingual nitroglycerin before CCT may lead to a radiological overestimation of calcific stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.