ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Current Assistive Devices Usage and Recommendations for a Future Artificial Vision Prosthesis among Patients with Severe Visual Impairment Due to Inherited Retinal Diseases.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient Preferences for the PRIMA Retinal Prosthesis for Vision Restoration for Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An International Survey Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) utilize various adaptive techniques and devices designed to assist them with activities of daily living (ADLs). The purpose of this study was to assess the assistive devices used by patients with IRDs, the difficulties they face despite these devices, and their recommendations for a future visual prosthesis. In collaboration with blind patients, an online survey was developed and administered to adults with IRDs and visual acuities of 20/400 to no light perception in the better-seeing eye. We analyzed data from 121 survey respondents (aged 18 to >80 years). Five respondents were Argus II prosthesis recipients. The most commonly used aids were cellular phones/tablets for reading (63.6%) as well as a sighted guide (75.0%) and a cane (71.4%) for mobility. Despite current assistive devices, participants reported continued difficulty with ADLs. Improved navigation, reading, and facial recognition were ranked the most desirable features for future visual prostheses. Argus II recipients suggested technology with improved ability to recognize objects and obstacles, detect movement, and cut out busy backgrounds. These insights are valuable in shaping the design of future prosthetic devices tailored to the needs of IRD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.