Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37629237›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Does Regular Practice with a "Flexible Bronchoscopy Simulator" Improve Fibreoptic Intubation Skills in Experts and Novices? A Randomized Controlled Study.

Maartje van Haperen, Tom C P M Kemper, Jeroen Hermanides, Susanne Eberl, Markus W Hollmann, Jennifer S Breel, Benedikt Preckel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maartje van HaperenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tom C P M KemperDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen HermanidesDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2239-1260
Susanne EberlDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6609-5888
Markus W HollmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8248-0244
Jennifer S BreelDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Benedikt PreckelDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4412-9183
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe appropriate management of a "difficult airway" remains a challenge for novices and experienced anaesthetists. With the current available airway technologies, e.g., video laryngoscopy, flexible bronchoscopy (fibreoptic intubation (FOI)) for endotracheal intubation is decreasing, likely diminishing caregiver skills. We investigated whether bronchoscopy simulator training improved FOI skills.

methods72 volunteers, consisting of anaesthetists, anaesthesia residents, and nurses, performed six exercises on a bronchoscopy simulator. At baseline and after 12 months, the six exercises included one serious game (to train agility), two basic airways, and three difficult airways. After a baseline assessment, subjects were randomly allocated to the intervention group (with) or control group without bronchoscopy simulator training every six weeks for 10 min using a preloaded serious game. The primary outcome was the difference in the time to reach the carina after 12 months, as measured objectively by the simulator. The level of stress and FOI confidence after 12 months were secondary outcomes.

resultsThe control and intervention groups had a similar time to reach the carina in difficult airway cases and the reported stress levels, at baseline and 12 months, showed no difference. In contrast, the intervention group's self-reported confidence in FOI skills improved more.

conclusionsAlthough participants rated higher in confidence, practicing FOI skills on an airway simulator with an agility game did not increase their performance in simulated challenging airway instances.

Indexed as

airway managementairway simulatoreducationfibreoptic intubationsimulated difficult airway

Identifiers

PMID37629237
PMCPMC10455177
OpenAlexW4385707299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.