Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37629213›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Position of the ISTENT Inject

Julian Alexander Zimmermann, Jens Julian Storp, Ralph-Laurent Merté, Peter Heiduschka, Nicole Eter, Viktoria Constanze Brücher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Preserflo microshunt outcomes in pigmentary glaucoma: a propensity score-matched comparison with primary open-angle glaucoma.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Functional assessment of the XENGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery Procedure in the Human Eye. A Fluid Structure Interaction Study.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julian Alexander ZimmermannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Jens Julian StorpDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, 48149 Muenster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8063-6548
Ralph-Laurent MertéDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Peter HeiduschkaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Nicole EterDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Viktoria Constanze BrücherDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, 48149 Muenster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5536-8043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness globally and is characterized by the gradual loss of retinal ganglion cells. The primary risk factor for the development and progression of glaucoma is increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Numerous surgical interventions exist to lower IOP should conservative therapy fail. One trend in recent years has been minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) as an alternative to traditional methods. The ISTENT inject

Indexed as

glaucomagonioscopyMIGS

Identifiers

PMID37629213
PMCPMC10455890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.