Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37629168›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Investigational Drugs for the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Miguel Á Huerta, Miguel M Garcia, Beliu García-Parra, Ancor Serrano-Afonso, Nancy Paniagua

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Immunoinflammatory mechanisms and emerging therapies for postherpetic neuralgia.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. [StagingZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miguel Á HuertaDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2842-0085
Miguel M GarciaArea of Pharmacology, Nutrition and Bromatology, Department of Basic Health Sciences, Unidad Asociada I+D+i Instituto de Química Médica (IQM) CSIC-URJC, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6910-0494
Beliu García-ParraClinical Neurophysiology Section-Neurology Service, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona-Health Campus, IDIBELL, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4458-2711
Ancor Serrano-AfonsoDepartment of Anesthesia, Reanimation and Pain Clinic, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona-Health Campus, IDIBELL, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6099-6290
Nancy PaniaguaArea of Pharmacology, Nutrition and Bromatology, Department of Basic Health Sciences, Unidad Asociada I+D+i Instituto de Química Médica (IQM) CSIC-URJC, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain.
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) FPU21/02736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacological treatment of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is unsatisfactory, and there is a clinical need for new approaches. Several drugs under advanced clinical development are addressed in this review. A systematic literature search was conducted in three electronic databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus) and in the ClinicalTrials.gov register from 1 January 2016 to 1 June 2023 to identify Phase II, III and IV clinical trials evaluating drugs for the treatment of PHN. A total of 18 clinical trials were selected evaluating 15 molecules with pharmacological actions on nine different molecular targets: Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor (AT2R) antagonism (olodanrigan), Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel (VGCC) α2δ subunit inhibition (crisugabalin, mirogabalin and pregabalin), Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel (VGSC) blockade (funapide and lidocaine), Cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) inhibition (TRK-700), Adaptor-Associated Kinase 1 (AAK1) inhibition (LX9211), Lanthionine Synthetase C-Like Protein (LANCL) activation (LAT8881), N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism (esketamine), mu opioid receptor agonism (tramadol, oxycodone and hydromorphone) and Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) inhibition (fulranumab). In brief, there are several drugs in advanced clinical development for treating PHN with some of them reporting promising results. AT2R antagonism, AAK1 inhibition, LANCL activation and NGF inhibition are considered first-in-class analgesics. Hopefully, these trials will result in a better clinical management of PHN.

Indexed as

Neuralgia, PostherpeticDrugs, InvestigationalHumansNerve Growth FactorPregabalinRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDrugs, InvestigationalNerve Growth FactorPregabalinAAK1analgesicAT2RCOXfirst in classLANCLnerve growth factorneuropathic painNMDAopioid

Identifiers

PMID37629168
PMCPMC10455720
OpenAlexW4386030218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.