ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Correlation between Circulating miR-16, miR-29a, miR-144 and miR-150, and the Radiotherapy Response and Survival of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- MicroRNA-Mediated Regulation of Ionizing Radiation Responses: Mechanisms and Advances in Clinical Translation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- A visual analysis of the research dynamics of biomarkers for lung cancer screening.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- mTOR in radiotherapy of lung cancer: Mechanisms of radiation resistance and therapeutic implications (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
- Role of non-coding RNAs in radiotherapy sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Recent advances in liquid biopsy for precision oncology: emerging biomarkers and clinical applications in lung cancer.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Circulating non-coding RNAs as a tool for liquid biopsy in solid tumors.Epigenomics · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy techniques and lung cancer: diagnosis, monitoring and evaluation.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the success of current therapy concepts, patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) still have a very poor prognosis. Therefore, biological markers are urgently needed, which allow the assessment of prognosis, or prediction of the success of therapy or resistance in this disease. Circulating microRNAs (miRs) have potential as biomarkers for the prognosis and prediction of response to therapy in cancer patients. Based on recent evidence that circulating miR-16, miR-29a, miR-144 and miR-150 can be regulated by ionizing radiation, the concentration of these four miRs was assessed in the plasma of NSCLC patients at different time points of radiotherapy by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Furthermore, their impact on patients' prognosis was evaluated. The mean plasma levels of miR-16, miR-29a, miR-144 and miR-150 significantly differed intra- and inter-individually, and during therapy in NSCLC patients, but showed a strong positive correlation. The individual plasma levels of miR-16, miR-29a and miR-144 had prognostic value in NSCLC patients during or at the end of radiotherapy in Cox's regression models. NSCLC patients with low levels of these three miRs at the end of radiotherapy had the worst prognosis. However, miR-150 plasma levels and treatment-dependent changes were not predictive. In conclusion, circulating miR-16, miR-29a and miR-144, but not miR-150, have a prognostic value in NSCLC patients undergoing radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.