Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37628978›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Prostate Cancer: Genetics, Epigenetics and the Need for Immunological Biomarkers.

Guzel Rafikova, Irina Gilyazova, Kadriia Enikeeva, Valentin Pavlov, Julia Kzhyshkowska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. APurinergic signalling · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Assessment of prostate cancer awareness and screening knowledge among men in Najran, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guzel RafikovaInstitute of Urology and Clinical Oncology, Bashkir State Medical University, 450077 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8763-6102
Irina GilyazovaInstitute of Urology and Clinical Oncology, Bashkir State Medical University, 450077 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9499-5632
Kadriia EnikeevaInstitute of Urology and Clinical Oncology, Bashkir State Medical University, 450077 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5995-2124
Valentin PavlovInstitute of Urology and Clinical Oncology, Bashkir State Medical University, 450077 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2125-4897
Julia KzhyshkowskaLaboratory for Translational Cellular and Molecular Biomedicine, Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-15-2021-1073Strategic Academic Leadership Program PRIORITY-2030Tomsk State University PRIORITY 2030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiological data highlight prostate cancer as a significant global health issue, with high incidence and substantial impact on patients' quality of life. The prevalence of this disease is associated with various factors, including age, heredity, and race. Recent research in prostate cancer genetics has identified several genetic variants that may be associated with an increased risk of developing the disease. However, despite the significance of these findings, genetic markers for prostate cancer are not currently utilized in clinical practice as reliable indicators of the disease. In addition to genetics, epigenetic alterations also play a crucial role in prostate cancer development. Aberrant DNA methylation, changes in chromatin structure, and microRNA (miRNA) expression are major epigenetic events that influence oncogenesis. Existing markers for prostate cancer, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA), have limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The cost of testing, follow-up procedures, and treatment for false-positive results and overdiagnosis contributes to the overall healthcare expenditure. Improving the effectiveness of prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis requires either narrowing the risk group by identifying new genetic factors or enhancing the sensitivity and specificity of existing markers. Immunological biomarkers (both circulating and intra-tumoral), including markers of immune response and immune dysfunction, represent a potentially useful area of research for enhancing the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Our review emphasizes the need for developing novel immunological biomarkers to improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of prostate cancer. We highlight the most recent achievements in the identification of biomarkers provided by circulating monocytes and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). We highlight that monocyte-derived and TAM-derived biomarkers can enable to establish the missing links between genetic predisposition, hormonal metabolism and immune responses in prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeBiomarkersEpigenesis, GeneticHumansMaleProstate-Specific AntigenBiomarkersProstate-Specific Antigencancer biomarkerscancer epigeneticcancer geneticsmonocytesprostate cancerTAMstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID37628978
PMCPMC10454494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.