ArticleGenes2023
Steadfast Toll Like Receptor 4 (
Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from patient blood is emerging as a noninvasive diagnostic avenue for various cancers. We aimed to identify reliable biomarkers in cfDNA by investigating genes exhibiting significant differences between colorectal cancer and control samples. Our objective was to identify genes that showed a positive difference between cancer and control samples. To achieve this, we conducted an in silico analysis to identify genes that exhibit no significant variation in methylation between genomic DNA (gDNA) and cfDNA. We collected experimental data from publicly available repositories, which included 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) profiles of gDNA and cfDNA samples from both cancer patients and healthy individuals. By comparing and overlapping these two groups, we identified 187 genes of interest, of which 53 genes had a positive difference among colon cancer patients and healthy individuals. Next, we performed an ANOVA test on these genes, resulting in the identification of 12 genes that showed statistically significant higher levels of 5hmC in cfDNA and gDNA from cancer patients compared to healthy individuals. Additionally, we compared the 5hmC status of these genes between cfDNA and gDNA from cancer patients. Interestingly, we found that the 5hmC of the toll like receptor 4 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.