Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37628619›Full record

ArticleGenes2023

Amplicon-Based Microbiome Profiling: From Second- to Third-Generation Sequencing for Higher Taxonomic Resolution.

Elisabetta Notario, Grazia Visci, Bruno Fosso, Carmela Gissi, Nina Tanaskovic, Maria Rescigno, Marinella Marzano, Graziano Pesole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Revisiting multi-region 16S sequencing in gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elisabetta NotarioDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy.
Grazia VisciInstitute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 70126 Bari, Italy.
Bruno FossoDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2324-086X
Carmela GissiDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2269-079X
Nina TanaskovicPostbiotica S.r.l., 20123 Milan, Italy.
Maria RescignoIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6464-509X
Marinella MarzanoInstitute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9996-8817
Graziano PesoleDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3663-0859

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 16S rRNA amplicon-based sequencing approach represents the most common and cost-effective strategy with great potential for microbiome profiling. The use of second-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies has led to protocols based on the amplification of one or a few hypervariable regions, impacting the outcome of the analysis. Nowadays, comparative studies are necessary to assess different amplicon-based approaches, including the full-locus sequencing currently feasible thanks to third-generation sequencing (TGS) technologies. This study compared three different methods to achieve the deepest microbiome taxonomic characterization: (a) the single-region approach, (b) the multiplex approach, covering several regions of the target gene/region, both based on NGS short reads, and (c) the full-length approach, which analyzes the whole length of the target gene thanks to TGS long reads. Analyses carried out on benchmark microbiome samples, with a known taxonomic composition, highlighted a different classification performance, strongly associated with the type of hypervariable regions and the coverage of the target gene. Indeed, the full-length approach showed the greatest discriminating power, up to species level, also on complex real samples. This study supports the transition from NGS to TGS for the study of the microbiome, even if experimental and bioinformatic improvements are still necessary.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaComputational BiologyRNA, Ribosomal, 16STechnologyRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA amplicon-based sequencingmetagenomicsmicrobiomemock analysisnext-generation sequencingthird-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37628619
PMCPMC10454624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.