ReviewGenes2023
Insights from a Computational-Based Approach for Analyzing Autophagy Genes across Human Cancers.
Review in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting the autophagic network: A new frontier in colorectal cancer chemotherapy response.CytoJournal · 2026Article
- Crosstalk between NRP1 and autophagy in the tumor microenvironment: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic targeting.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Epithelial cell-related prognostic risk model in breast cancer based on single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last decade, there has been a boost in autophagy reports due to its role in cancer progression and its association with tumor resistance to treatment. Despite this, many questions remain to be elucidated and explored among the different tumors. Here, we used omics-based cancer datasets to identify autophagy genes as prognostic markers in cancer. We then combined these findings with independent studies to further characterize the clinical significance of these genes in cancer. Our observations highlight the importance of innovative approaches to analyze tumor heterogeneity, potentially affecting the expression of autophagy-related genes with either pro-tumoral or anti-tumoral functions. In silico analysis allowed for identifying three genes (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.