Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37628438›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Systematic Review of Machine Learning and IoT Applied to the Prediction and Monitoring of Cardiovascular Diseases.

Alejandra Cuevas-Chávez, Yasmín Hernández, Javier Ortiz-Hernandez, Eduardo Sánchez-Jiménez, Gilberto Ochoa-Ruiz, Joaquín Pérez, Gabriel González-Serna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. How does the precise prediction of preeclampsia onset aid the overall management of preeclampsia?Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alejandra Cuevas-ChávezComputer Science Department, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Cenidet, Cuernavaca 62490, Mexico.
Yasmín HernándezComputer Science Department, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Cenidet, Cuernavaca 62490, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8842-0899
Javier Ortiz-HernandezComputer Science Department, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Cenidet, Cuernavaca 62490, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-6481-1537
Eduardo Sánchez-JiménezComputer Science Department, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Cenidet, Cuernavaca 62490, Mexico.
Gilberto Ochoa-RuizSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Av. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9896-8727
Joaquín PérezComputer Science Department, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Cenidet, Cuernavaca 62490, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5138-7984
Gabriel González-SernaComputer Science Department, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Cenidet, Cuernavaca 62490, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1874-9402

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the Pan American Health Organization, cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide, claiming an estimated 17.9 million lives each year. This paper presents a systematic review to highlight the use of IoT, IoMT, and machine learning to detect, predict, or monitor cardiovascular disease. We had a final sample of 164 high-impact journal papers, focusing on two categories: cardiovascular disease detection using IoT/IoMT technologies and cardiovascular disease using machine learning techniques. For the first category, we found 82 proposals, while for the second, we found 85 proposals. The research highlights list of IoT/IoMT technologies, machine learning techniques, datasets, and the most discussed cardiovascular diseases. Neural networks have been popularly used, achieving an accuracy of over 90%, followed by random forest, XGBoost, k-NN, and SVM. Based on the results, we conclude that IoT/IoMT technologies can predict cardiovascular diseases in real time, ensemble techniques obtained one of the best performances in the accuracy metric, and hypertension and arrhythmia were the most discussed diseases. Finally, we identified the lack of public data as one of the main obstacles for machine learning approaches for cardiovascular disease prediction.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseaseIoMTIoTmachine learningsystematic reviewwearable technologies

Identifiers

PMID37628438
PMCPMC10454027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.