ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Pediatric Palliative Care: Insights into Assessment Tools andReview Instruments.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcome measurement tools in pediatric oncology palliative care: a scoping review of domains, validation and contextual relevance.BJC reports · 2026Review
- ICD-10-based screening increased detection of hospitalisations potentially eligible for paediatric palliative care consultation in the emergency department: a validation study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Measuring the psychological symptoms of pediatric palliative care patients and their caregivers: a scoping review of available instruments.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Translation and multi-site validation of the 'Pediatric Complex Care Needs Assessment Scale' (ACCAPED) from Italian to English.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Needs, status and future directions in palliative care for children with cancer: an insight into the Italian situation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- The impact of surgical simulation and training technologies on general surgery education.BMC medical education · 2024Review
- The specialized pediatric palliative care service in Italy: how is it working? Results of the nationwide PalliPed study.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- A cutting-edge new framework for the pain management in children: nanotechnology.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024Review
- Assessment of Parental Needs and Quality of Life in Children with a Rare Neuromuscular Disease (Pompe Disease): A Quantitative-Qualitative Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proper assessment of needs and outcomes in pediatric palliative care (PPC) is imperativeto ensure the best possible service to patients and families. However, given the multidimensionalnature of PPC, the low number of patients in this setting, the heterogeneity of diseases, the presenceof cognitive impairment in many patients, and the physiological development of children, outcomescan be complex and difficult to measure. Consequently, in this context, the use of standardizedand validated tools to assess the needs of children and families, to assess symptom severity, andto estimate the quality of PPC service represent a current need. Even if efforts have been made tostandardize approaches and tools for palliative care in adults, to our knowledge, a similar comprehensiveassessment of PPC has not yet been conducted to date. This narrative review provides anoverview and discusses the evaluation of tools currently applied in PPC, with an educational intentfor healthcare providers. We found that several instruments are available to assess different dimensionsof PPC. We proposed a classification into eligibility tools, patient and family needs assessmenttools, and care assessment tools. At present, two main eligibility tools exist, the PaPaS Scale and theACCAPED Scale questionnaire. Most of the tools for patient and family needs assessment have notbeen specifically validated in the PPC setting, and many may be more readily applied in researchsettings rather than in daily practice. Similar considerations can be made for tools assessing QoL,while tools assessing PPC service quality seem to be easily applied. Efforts to develop new specifictools and validate existing ones are undoubtedly advocated. However, in the patient's best interest,PPC healthcare providers should start using available tools, regardless of their validation status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.