Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37628309›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Congenital Syphilis-An Illustrative Review.

Deepika Sankaran, Elizabeth Partridge, Satyan Lakshminrusimha

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Elimination of congenital syphilis: a nationwide register-based study, Denmark, 2010 to 2024.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. State-of-the-Art Review: Congenital Syphilis in the Modern Era: Current Strategies and Future Directions.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Update on syphilis diagnostics.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deepika SankaranDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6704-6949
Elizabeth PartridgeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Satyan LakshminrusimhaDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6098-2155
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Optimal Oxygenation in Neonatal Lung InjuryR01HD072929 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Satyanarayana Lakshminrusimha · 2012 to 2026
$5.4M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 5 R01 HD072929 09NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital syphilis is caused by the spirochete,

Indexed as

congenital syphilishydropssyphilistreponema pallidumvertical transmission

Identifiers

PMID37628309
PMCPMC10453258
OpenAlexW4385421711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.