Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37628013›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Exploring Consumer Behavior and Preferences in Welfare-Friendly Pork Breeding: A Multivariate Analysis.

Michela Pugliese, Annalisa Previti, Angelina De Pascale, Angela Alibrandi, Agata Zirilli, Vito Biondi, Annamaria Passantino, Salvatore Monti, Carlo Giannetto, Maurizio Lanfranchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michela PuglieseDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Via Umberto Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0440-5457
Annalisa PrevitiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Via Umberto Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy.
Angelina De PascaleDepartment of Economics, University of Messina, Via dei Verdi 75, 98122 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7550-9798
Angela AlibrandiDepartment of Economics, University of Messina, Via dei Verdi 75, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Agata ZirilliDepartment of Economics, University of Messina, Via dei Verdi 75, 98122 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2950-8946
Vito BiondiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Via Umberto Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8717-1966
Annamaria PassantinoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Via Umberto Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-3636
Salvatore MontiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Via Umberto Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy.
Carlo GiannettoDepartment of Economics, University of Messina, Via dei Verdi 75, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Maurizio LanfranchiDepartment of Economics, University of Messina, Via dei Verdi 75, 98122 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2372-2730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates consumer behavior and interest in "welfare-friendly" forms of pork production, considering the growing presence of animal welfare-focused breeding practices. The aim is to outline the typical profile of pork consumers and identify the key attributes influencing their purchasing decisions. A survey was conducted on a sample of 286 individuals after excluding those who only consumed beef and/or poultry or identified as vegetarians/vegans. Regression coefficients (b), 95% Confidence Intervals (95% C.I.), and

Indexed as

animal welfarechoicespork consumerspurchasing habitswelfare-friendly livestock

Identifiers

PMID37628013
PMCPMC10453549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.