Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37627975›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Keratoconus Diagnosis: From Fundamentals to Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Narrative Review.

Sana Niazi, Marta Jiménez-García, Oliver Findl, Zisis Gatzioufas, Farideh Doroodgar, Mohammad Hasan Shahriari, Mohammad Ali Javadi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Deep learning approach for analyzing regional scheimpflug corneal images to assess keratoconus progression.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Trends in the Management of Keratoconus in Australia.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Sana NiaziTranslational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 1336616351, Iran.
Marta Jiménez-GarcíaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), 2650 Edegem, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2839-9696
Oliver FindlDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Hanusch Hospital, 1140 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1393-1598
Zisis GatzioufasDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Farideh DoroodgarTranslational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 1336616351, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3758-0569
Mohammad Hasan ShahriariDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 1971653313, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5596-1958
Mohammad Ali JavadiOphthalmic Research Center, Labbafinezhad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 19395-4741, Iran.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRHanusch Hospital · ATTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The remarkable recent advances in managing keratoconus, the most common corneal ectasia, encouraged researchers to conduct further studies on the disease. Despite the abundance of information about keratoconus, debates persist regarding the detection of mild cases. Early detection plays a crucial role in facilitating less invasive treatments. This review encompasses corneal data ranging from the basic sciences to the application of artificial intelligence in keratoconus patients. Diagnostic systems utilize automated decision trees, support vector machines, and various types of neural networks, incorporating input from various corneal imaging equipment. Although the integration of artificial intelligence techniques into corneal imaging devices may take time, their popularity in clinical practice is increasing. Most of the studies reviewed herein demonstrate a high discriminatory power between normal and keratoconus cases, with a relatively lower discriminatory power for subclinical keratoconus.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiomechanical phenomenacomputercorneal topographydeep learningdiagnosiskeratoconusmachine learningneural networksoptical coherence

Identifiers

PMID37627975
PMCPMC10453081
OpenAlexW4386026707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.