Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37627956›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Prostate MRI and PSMA-PET in the Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Lorenzo Cereser, Laura Evangelista, Gianluca Giannarini, Rossano Girometti

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07011342 (Utility of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer After Focal Gland Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07011342 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Utility of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer After Focal Gland Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorHackensack Meridian HealthRan2025 to 2028Enrolled70ConditionsProstate CancerArms18F-rhPSMA-7.3
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Diagnostic value of [Frontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lorenzo CereserInstitute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, 20072 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4480-8872
Laura EvangelistaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5955-9488
Gianluca GiannariniUrology Unit, University Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, Azienda Sanitaria-Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), p.le S. Maria della Misericordia, 15, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6995-246X
Rossano GiromettiInstitute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, 20072 Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last years, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained a key role in the primary diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). While a negative MRI can avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies and the overdiagnosis of indolent cancers, a positive examination triggers biopsy samples targeted to suspicious imaging findings, thus increasing the diagnosis of csPCa with a sensitivity and negative predictive value of around 90%. The limitations of MRI, including suboptimal positive predictive values, are fueling debate on how to stratify biopsy decisions and management based on patient risk and how to correctly estimate it with clinical and/or imaging findings. In this setting, "next-generation imaging" imaging based on radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is expanding its indications both in the setting of primary staging (intermediate-to-high risk patients) and primary diagnosis (e.g., increasing the sensitivity of MRI or acting as a problem-solving tool for indeterminate MRI cases). This review summarizes the current main evidence on the role of prostate MRI and PSMA-PET as tools for the primary diagnosis of csPCa, and the different possible interaction pathways in this setting.

Indexed as

biopsymagnetic resonance imagingneoplasm stagingpositron-emission tomography computed tomographyprostatic neoplasmsradiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID37627956
PMCPMC10453091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.