Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37627879›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity and Mean Pressure Gradient for the Prediction of Pulmonary Hypertension According to the New Hemodynamic Definition.

Giulia Elena Mandoli, Federico Landra, Benedetta Chiantini, Carlotta Sciaccaluga, Maria Concetta Pastore, Marta Focardi, Luna Cavigli, Flavio D'Ascenzi, Sonia Bernazzali, Massimo Maccherini and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Haemodynamics and post-exercise recovery response in COPD-PH and ILD-PH: An appraisal.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Giulia Elena MandoliDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Cardiology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Federico LandraDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Cardiology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2106-0884
Benedetta ChiantiniDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Cardiology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Carlotta SciaccalugaDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Cardiology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Maria Concetta PastoreDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Cardiology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7223-141X
Marta FocardiDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Cardiology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0879-8526
Luna CavigliDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Cardiology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3305-792X
Flavio D'AscenziDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Cardiology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0947-6836
Sonia BernazzaliDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1299-3380
Massimo MaccheriniDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Serafina ValenteDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Cardiology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Matteo CameliDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Cardiology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3872-8964
Michael HeneinInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6089-5614
University of Siena · ITUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hemodynamic definition of PH has recently been revised with unchanged threshold of peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV). The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive accuracy of peak TRV for PH based on the new (>20 mmHg) and the old (>25 mmHg) cut-off value for mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and to compare it with the mean right ventricular-right atrial (RV-RA) pressure gradient.

methodsPatients with advanced heart failure were screened from 2016 to 2021. The exclusion criteria were absent right heart catheterization (RHC) results, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, any septal defect, inadequate acoustic window or undetectable TR. The mean RV-RA gradient was calculated from the velocity-time integral of TR.

resultsThe study included 41 patients; 34 (82.9%) had mPAP > 20 mmHg and 24 (58.5%) had mPAP > 25 mmHg. The AUC for the prediction of PH with mPAP > 20 mmHg was 0.855 for peak TRV and mean RV-RA gradient was 0.811. AUC for the prediction of PH defined as mPAP > 25 mmHg for peak TRV was 0.860 and for mean RV-RA gradient was 0.830. A cutoff value of 2.4 m/s for peak TRV had 65% sensitivity and 100% positive predictive value for predicting PH according to the new definition.

conclusionsPeak TRV performed better than mean RV-RA pressure gradient in predicting PH irrespective of hemodynamic definitions. Peak TRV performed similarly with the two definitions of PH, but a lower cutoff value had higher sensitivity and equal positive predictive value for PH.

Indexed as

echocardiographypulmonary hypertensionright heart catheterization

Identifiers

PMID37627879
PMCPMC10453142
OpenAlexW4385655262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.