Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37627877›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

MISM: A Medical Image Segmentation Metric for Evaluation of Weak Labeled Data.

Dennis Hartmann, Verena Schmid, Philip Meyer, Florian Auer, Iñaki Soto-Rey, Dominik Müller, Frank Kramer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dennis HartmannIT-Infrastructure for Translational Medical Research, University of Augsburg, 86159 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8751-2505
Verena SchmidIT-Infrastructure for Translational Medical Research, University of Augsburg, 86159 Augsburg, Germany.
Philip MeyerMedical Data Integration Center, Institute for Digital Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Florian AuerIT-Infrastructure for Translational Medical Research, University of Augsburg, 86159 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5320-8900
Iñaki Soto-ReyMedical Data Integration Center, Institute for Digital Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3061-5818
Dominik MüllerIT-Infrastructure for Translational Medical Research, University of Augsburg, 86159 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0838-9885
Frank KramerIT-Infrastructure for Translational Medical Research, University of Augsburg, 86159 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2857-7122

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research 13GW0499EFederal Ministry of Education and Research FKZ01ZZ1804E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Performance measures are an important tool for assessing and comparing different medical image segmentation algorithms. Unfortunately, the current measures have their weaknesses when it comes to assessing certain edge cases. These limitations arise when images with a very small region of interest or without a region of interest at all are assessed. As a solution to these limitations, we propose a new medical image segmentation metric: MISm. This metric is a composition of the Dice similarity coefficient and the weighted specificity. MISm was investigated for definition gaps, an appropriate scoring gradient, and different weighting coefficients used to propose a constant value. Furthermore, an evaluation was performed by comparing the popular metrics in the medical image segmentation and MISm using images of magnet resonance tomography from several fictitious prediction scenarios. Our analysis shows that MISm can be applied in a general way and thus also covers the mentioned edge cases, which are not covered by other metrics, in a reasonable way. In order to allow easy access to MISm and therefore widespread application in the community, as well as reproducibility of experimental results, we included MISm in the publicly available evaluation framework MISeval.

Indexed as

biomedical image segmentationevaluationmedical image analysisperformance assessment

Identifiers

PMID37627877
PMCPMC10453729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.