Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37627868›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Exploring New Therapeutic Avenues for Ophthalmic Disorders: Glaucoma-Related Molecular Docking Evaluation and Bibliometric Analysis for Improved Management of Ocular Diseases.

Flaviu Bodea, Simona Gabriela Bungau, Andrei Paul Negru, Ada Radu, Alexandra Georgiana Tarce, Delia Mirela Tit, Alexa Florina Bungau, Cristian Bustea, Tapan Behl, Andrei-Flavius Radu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Meeting Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Glaucoma.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Flaviu BodeaDoctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.
Simona Gabriela BungauDoctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3236-1292
Andrei Paul NegruDoctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9898-0753
Ada RaduDucfarm Pharmacy, 410514 Oradea, Romania.
Alexandra Georgiana TarceMedicine Program of Study, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania.
Delia Mirela TitDoctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0296-6592
Alexa Florina BungauDoctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.
Cristian BusteaDepartment of Surgery, Oradea County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 410169 Oradea, Romania.
Tapan BehlSchool of Health Sciences &Technology, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun 248007, India.
Andrei-Flavius RaduDoctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7625-8177
University of Oradea · ROUniversity of Petroleum and Energy Studies · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ophthalmic disorders consist of a broad spectrum of ailments that impact the structures and functions of the eye. Due to the crucial function of the retina in the vision process, the management of eye ailments is of the utmost importance, but several unmet needs have been identified in terms of the outcome measures in clinical trials, more proven minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, and a lack of comprehensive bibliometric assessments, among others. The current evaluation seeks to fulfill several of these unmet needs via a dual approach consisting of a molecular docking analysis based on the potential of ripasudil and fasudil to inhibit Rho-associated protein kinases (ROCKs), virtual screening of ligands, and pharmacokinetic predictions, emphasizing the identification of new compounds potentially active in the management of glaucoma, and a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the most recent publications indexed in the Web of Science evaluating the management of several of the most common eye conditions. This method resulted in the finding of ligands (i.e., ZINC000000022706 with the most elevated binding potential for ROCK1 and ZINC000034800307 in the case of ROCK2) that are not presently utilized in any therapeutic regimen but may represent a future option to be successfully applied in the therapeutic scheme of glaucoma following further comprehensive testing validations. In addition, this research also analyzed multiple papers listed in the Web of Science collection of databases via the VOSviewer application to deliver, through descriptive analysis of the results, an in-depth overview of publications contributing to the present level of comprehension in therapeutic approaches to ocular diseases in terms of scientific impact, citation analyses, most productive authors, journals, and countries, as well as collaborative networks. Based on the molecular docking study's preliminary findings, the most promising candidates must be thoroughly studied to determine their efficacy and risk profiles. Bibliometric analysis may also help researchers set targets to improve ocular disease outcomes.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysisglaucomamicropulse laser therapymolecular dockingocular disease therapyretinal diseases

Identifiers

PMID37627868
PMCPMC10451968
OpenAlexW4386030259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.