Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37627857›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Localization of Colorectal Cancer Lesions in Contrast-Computed Tomography Images via a Deep Learning Approach.

Prasan Kumar Sahoo, Pushpanjali Gupta, Ying-Chieh Lai, Sum-Fu Chiang, Jeng-Fu You, Djeane Debora Onthoni, Yih-Jong Chern

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A deep learning-based automated pipeline for colorectal cancer detection in contrast-enhanced CT images.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prasan Kumar SahooDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chang Gung University, Guishan, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3496-1195
Pushpanjali GuptaDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chang Gung University, Guishan, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6077-9701
Ying-Chieh LaiDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, New Taipei City 33305, Taiwan.
Sum-Fu ChiangDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, New Taipei City 33305, Taiwan.
Jeng-Fu YouDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, New Taipei City 33305, Taiwan.
Djeane Debora OnthoniDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chang Gung University, Guishan, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6990-9456
Yih-Jong ChernDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, New Taipei City 33305, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7572-4930
Chang Gung University · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

NATIONAL SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL (NSTC), TAIWAN 110-2314-B-182A-096-, 110-2221-E-182-008-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is a frequently used imaging modality for evaluating gastrointestinal diseases. The detection of colorectal cancer is often realized using CT before a more invasive colonoscopy. When a CT exam is performed for indications other than colorectal evaluation, the tortuous structure of the long, tubular colon makes it difficult to analyze the colon carefully and thoroughly. In addition, the sensitivity of CT in detecting colorectal cancer is greatly dependent on the size of the tumor. Missed incidental colon cancers using CT are an emerging problem for clinicians and radiologists; consequently, the automatic localization of lesions in the CT images of unprepared bowels is needed. Therefore, this study used artificial intelligence (AI) to localize colorectal cancer in CT images. We enrolled 190 colorectal cancer patients to obtain 1558 tumor slices annotated by radiologists and colorectal surgeons. The tumor sites were double-confirmed via colonoscopy or other related examinations, including physical examination or image study, and the final tumor sites were obtained from the operation records if available. The localization and training models used were RetinaNet, YOLOv3, and YOLOv8. We achieved an F1 score of 0.97 (±0.002), a mAP of 0.984 when performing slice-wise testing, 0.83 (±0.29) sensitivity, 0.97 (±0.01) specificity, and 0.96 (±0.01) accuracy when performing patient-wise testing using our derived model YOLOv8 with hyperparameter tuning.

Indexed as

colorectal cancercomputed tomographydeep learninglocalization

Identifiers

PMID37627857
PMCPMC10451186
OpenAlexW4385948864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.