Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37627649›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Engineering 3D-Printed Advanced Healthcare Materials for Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

Iván Yuste, Francis C Luciano, Brayan J Anaya, Pablo Sanz-Ruiz, Almudena Ribed-Sánchez, Elena González-Burgos, Dolores R Serrano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antimicrobial 3D printed implants for periprosthetic joint infections.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Iván YustePharmaceutics and Food Technology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Francis C LucianoPharmaceutics and Food Technology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Brayan J AnayaPharmaceutics and Food Technology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0846-9044
Pablo Sanz-RuizOrthopaedic and Trauma Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7588-1880
Almudena Ribed-SánchezHospital Pharmacy Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7339-8054
Elena González-BurgosDepartment of Pharmacology, Pharmacognosy and Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2119-8768
Dolores R SerranoPharmaceutics and Food Technology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0475-8420
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ES

Funding

Complutense University of Madrid Formulacion y biodisponibilidad de nuevos medicamentosEuropean Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases to Dolores Serrano Project 16306Ministerio Ciencia e Innovación PID2021-126310OA-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of additive manufacturing or 3D printing in biomedicine has experienced fast growth in the last few years, becoming a promising tool in pharmaceutical development and manufacturing, especially in parenteral formulations and implantable drug delivery systems (IDDSs). Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a common complication in arthroplasties, with a prevalence of over 4%. There is still no treatment that fully covers the need for preventing and treating biofilm formation. However, 3D printing plays a major role in the development of novel therapies for PJIs. This review will provide a deep understanding of the different approaches based on 3D-printing techniques for the current management and prophylaxis of PJIs. The two main strategies are focused on IDDSs that are loaded or coated with antimicrobials, commonly in combination with bone regeneration agents and 3D-printed orthopedic implants with modified surfaces and antimicrobial properties. The wide variety of printing methods and materials have allowed for the manufacture of IDDSs that are perfectly adjusted to patients' physiognomy, with different drug release profiles, geometries, and inner and outer architectures, and are fully individualized, targeting specific pathogens. Although these novel treatments are demonstrating promising results, in vivo studies and clinical trials are required for their translation from the bench to the market.

Indexed as

3D printingantimicrobialcoatingimplantinfectionparenteral drug deliveryPJIsprosthesis

Identifiers

PMID37627649
PMCPMC10451995
OpenAlexW4385277748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.