Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37627172›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Impact of H&E Stain Normalization on Deep Learning Models in Cancer Image Classification: Performance, Complexity, and Trade-Offs.

Nuwan Madusanka, Pramudini Jayalath, Dileepa Fernando, Lasith Yasakethu, Byeong-Il Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nuwan MadusankaDigital Healthcare Research Center, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7982-1036
Pramudini JayalathInstitute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany.
Dileepa FernandoSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore.
Lasith YasakethuDepartment of Software Engineering, Sri Lanka Technological Campus (SLTC), Padukka 10500, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0002-9571-6866
Byeong-Il LeeDigital Healthcare Research Center, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification of cancer images plays a crucial role in diagnosis and treatment planning. Deep learning (DL) models have shown promise in achieving high accuracy, but their performance can be influenced by variations in Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining techniques. In this study, we investigate the impact of H&E stain normalization on the performance of DL models in cancer image classification. We evaluate the performance of VGG19, VGG16, ResNet50, MobileNet, Xception, and InceptionV3 on a dataset of H&E-stained cancer images. Our findings reveal that while VGG16 exhibits strong performance, VGG19 and ResNet50 demonstrate limitations in this context. Notably, stain normalization techniques significantly improve the performance of less complex models such as MobileNet and Xception. These models emerge as competitive alternatives with lower computational complexity and resource requirements and high computational efficiency. The results highlight the importance of optimizing less complex models through stain normalization to achieve accurate and reliable cancer image classification. This research holds tremendous potential for advancing the development of computationally efficient cancer classification systems, ultimately benefiting cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

cancer classificationcomputational complexitydeep learningimage classificationstain normalization

Identifiers

PMID37627172
PMCPMC10452714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.