Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37627155›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Conventional DNA-Damaging Cancer Therapies and Emerging cGAS-STING Activation: A Review and Perspectives Regarding Immunotherapeutic Potential.

Jordan D Lewicky, Alexandrine L Martel, Mukul Raj Gupta, René Roy, Galaxia M Rodriguez, Barbara C Vanderhyden, Hoang-Thanh Le

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jordan D LewickyHealth Sciences North Research Institute, 56 Walford Road, Sudbury, ON P3E 2H2, Canada.
Alexandrine L MartelHealth Sciences North Research Institute, 56 Walford Road, Sudbury, ON P3E 2H2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4475-0490
Mukul Raj GuptaGlycosciences and Nanomaterial Laboratory, Université du Québec à Montréal, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada.
René RoyGlycosciences and Nanomaterial Laboratory, Université du Québec à Montréal, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5638-7302
Galaxia M RodriguezCancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Rd., Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5366-6047
Barbara C VanderhydenCancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Rd., Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7644-7189
Hoang-Thanh LeHealth Sciences North Research Institute, 56 Walford Road, Sudbury, ON P3E 2H2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9952-5311
Health Sciences North · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

GlycoNet Collaborative Team Grant CR-25Mitacs IT32555Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RGPIN-2018-05570Northern Cancer Foundation 2023-2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many traditional cancer treatments such as radiation and chemotherapy are known to induce cellular DNA damage as part of their cytotoxic activity. The cGAS-STING signaling axis, a key member of the DNA damage response that acts as a sensor of foreign or aberrant cytosolic DNA, is helping to rationalize the DNA-damaging activity of these treatments and their emerging immunostimulatory capacity. Moreover, cGAS-STING, which is attracting considerable attention for its ability to promote antitumor immune responses, may fundamentally be able to address many of the barriers limiting the success of cancer immunotherapy strategies, including the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Herein, we review the traditional cancer therapies that have been linked with cGAS-STING activation, highlighting their targets with respect to their role and function in the DNA damage response. As part of the review, an emerging "chemoimmunotherapy" concept whereby DNA-damaging agents are used for the indirect activation of STING is discussed as an alternative to the direct molecular agonism strategies that are in development, but have yet to achieve clinical approval. The potential of this approach to address some of the inherent and emerging limitations of cGAS-STING signaling in cancer immunotherapy is also discussed. Ultimately, it is becoming clear that in order to successfully employ the immunotherapeutic potential of the cGAS-STING axis, a balance between its contrasting antitumor and protumor/inflammatory activities will need to be achieved.

Indexed as

cancer immunotherapycGAMPcGAS-STINGchemoimmunotherapychemotherapycytosolic DNADNA damage responseradiationtumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID37627155
PMCPMC10453198
OpenAlexW4385873492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.