Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37627148›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

AI-Assisted Screening of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders Using Smartphone-Based Photographic Images.

Vivek Talwar, Pragya Singh, Nirza Mukhia, Anupama Shetty, Praveen Birur, Karishma M Desai, Chinnababu Sunkavalli, Konala S Varma, Ramanathan Sethuraman, C V Jawahar and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Application of artificial intelligence in oral potentially malignant disorders: current opinions and future barriers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vivek TalwarCVIT, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500032, India.
Pragya SinghINAI, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500032, India.
Nirza MukhiaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, KLE Society's Institute of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru 560022, India.
Anupama ShettyBiocon Foundation, Bengaluru 560100, India.
Praveen BirurDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, KLE Society's Institute of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru 560022, India.
Karishma M DesaiiHUB-Data, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500032, India.
Chinnababu SunkavalliGrace Cancer Foundation, Hyderabad 501505, India.
Konala S VarmaINAI, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500032, India.
Ramanathan SethuramanIntel Technology India Private Limited, Bengaluru, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0708-7669
C V JawaharCVIT, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500032, India.
P K VinodCCNSB, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500032, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2968-498X
International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad · INIntel (India) · INKamineni Institute of Dental Sciences · INBiocon (India) · IN

Funding

Department of Science and Technology iHUB-Data, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) and oral cancer is surging in low- and middle-income countries. A lack of resources for population screening in remote locations delays the detection of these lesions in the early stages and contributes to higher mortality and a poor quality of life. Digital imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) are promising tools for cancer screening. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of AI-based techniques for detecting OPMDs in the Indian population using photographic images of oral cavities captured using a smartphone. A dataset comprising 1120 suspicious and 1058 non-suspicious oral cavity photographic images taken by trained front-line healthcare workers (FHWs) was used for evaluating the performance of different deep learning models based on convolution (DenseNets) and Transformer (Swin) architectures. The best-performing model was also tested on an additional independent test set comprising 440 photographic images taken by untrained FHWs (set I). DenseNet201 and Swin Transformer (base) models show high classification performance with an F1-score of 0.84 (CI 0.79-0.89) and 0.83 (CI 0.78-0.88) on the internal test set, respectively. However, the performance of models decreases on test set I, which has considerable variation in the image quality, with the best F1-score of 0.73 (CI 0.67-0.78) obtained using DenseNet201. The proposed AI model has the potential to identify suspicious and non-suspicious oral lesions using photographic images. This simplified image-based AI solution can assist in screening, early detection, and prompt referral for OPMDs.

Indexed as

deep learningoral cancer screeningphotographpoint-of-care solutionsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID37627148
PMCPMC10452422
OpenAlexW4385877626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.