Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37626878›Full record

ArticleCells2023

Immunotherapy around the Clock: Impact of Infusion Timing on Stage IV Melanoma Outcomes.

Lisa Gonçalves, Duarte Gonçalves, Teresa Esteban-Casanelles, Tiago Barroso, Inês Soares de Pinho, Raquel Lopes-Brás, Miguel Esperança-Martins, Vanessa Patel, Sofia Torres, Rita Teixeira de Sousa and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Life Factors and Melanoma: From the Macroscopic State to the Molecular Mechanism.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lisa GonçalvesDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3431-5217
Duarte GonçalvesDepartment of Economics, University College London, London WC1H 0AX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8586-6078
Teresa Esteban-CasanellesDepartment of Political Economy, King's College London, London WC2B 4BG, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-7034-4812
Tiago BarrosoDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4854-1642
Inês Soares de PinhoDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8377-0179
Raquel Lopes-BrásDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8976-3199
Miguel Esperança-MartinsDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6858-7341
Vanessa PatelDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal.
Sofia TorresDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal.
Rita Teixeira de SousaDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal.
André MansinhoSTART Lisbon, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8771-0838
Luís CostaDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4782-7318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the impact of circadian timing on immunotherapy has yet to be integrated into clinical practice, chronoimmunotherapy is an emerging and promising field as circadian oscillations are observed in immune cell numbers as well as the expression of immunotherapy targets, e.g., programmed cell death protein-1 and its ligand programmed death ligand 1. Concurrent retrospective studies suggest that morning infusions may lead to higher effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and kidney cancer. This paper discusses the results of a retrospective study (2016-2022) exploring the impact of infusion timing on the outcomes of all 73 patients with stage IV melanoma receiving immunotherapy at a particular medical center. While the median overall survival (OS) was 24.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.04-39.8), for a median follow-up of 15.3 months, our results show that having more than 75% of infusions in the afternoon results in shorter median OS (14.9 vs. 38.1 months; hazard ratio 0.45 [CI 0.23-0.86];

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungKidney NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsMelanomaFemaleHumansImmunotherapyProspective StudiesRetrospective Studiescancerchronobiologycircadianimmunotherapymelanoma

Identifiers

PMID37626878
PMCPMC10453728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.