Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37626762›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Immediate Effects of Anti-Spastic Epidural Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation on Functional Connectivity of the Central Motor System in Patients with Stroke- and Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Spasticity: A Pilot Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Larisa Mayorova, Margarita Radutnaya, Maria Varyukhina, Alexey Vorobyev, Vasiliy Zhdanov, Marina Petrova, Andrey Grechko

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06384170 (Closed Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06384170 withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Closed Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) for Neuromodulation of UMN-Lesion Spasticity

TypeobservationalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsChronic Pain, Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke, Upper Motor Neuron LesionArmsSpinal Cord Stimulation- Closed loop
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Larisa MayorovaLaboratory of Physiology of Sensory Systems, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117485 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5112-7878
Margarita RadutnayaFederal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, 107031 Moscow, Russia.
Maria VaryukhinaFederal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, 107031 Moscow, Russia.
Alexey VorobyevFederal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, 107031 Moscow, Russia.
Vasiliy ZhdanovFederal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, 107031 Moscow, Russia.
Marina PetrovaFederal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, 107031 Moscow, Russia.
Andrey GrechkoFederal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, 107031 Moscow, Russia.
V.A. Negovsky Scientific Research Institute of General Reanimatology · RUPeoples' Friendship University of Russia · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) is one approach to the potential improvement of patients with post-stroke or post-traumatic spasticity. However, little is known about whether and how such interventions alter supraspinal neural systems involved in the pathogenesis of spasticity. This pilot study investigated whether epidural spinal cord stimulation at the level of the C3-C5 cervical segments, aimed at reducing spasticity, alters the patterns of functional connectivity of the brain.

methodsEight patients with spasticity in the right limbs as a result of left cerebral hemisphere damage (due to hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke or traumatic and anoxic brain injury) were assessed with fMRI immediately before and immediately after short-term (1 to 6 days) test cervical epidural SCS therapy. Eight demographically and clinically comparable patients with spasticity in the right extremities due to a left hemisphere ischemic stroke and brain injury who received conventional therapy were examined as a control group. All patients also had paresis of one or two limbs and hyperreflexia.

resultsAfter the SCS therapy, there were three main findings: (1) higher functional connectivity of the brainstem to the right premotor cortex and changes in functional connectivity between cortical motor areas, (2) increased functional connectivity between the right and left lateral nodes of the sensorimotor network, and (3) a positive correlation between decreased spasticity in the right leg and increased functional connectivity within the right hemisphere sensorimotor cortex. All these changes in functional connectivity occurred with a statistically significant decrease in spasticity, as assessed using the modified Ashworth scale. The control group showed no decrease in spasticity or increase in functional connectivity in any of the seeds of interest. On the contrary, a decrease in functional connectivity of the brainstem and right postcentral gyrus was observed in this group during the observation period.

conclusionsWe were thus able to detect intrinsic brain connectivity rearrangements that occurred during spasticity mitigation following short epidural SCS therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: The clinical results obtained confirmed the efficacy of short-term anti-spastic SCS therapy. The obtained data on functional rearrangements of the central motor system may shed light on the mechanism of antispastic action of this procedure.

Indexed as

antispastic therapyfunctional connectivityresting-state fMRIspasticityspinal cord stimulationupper motor neuron

Identifiers

PMID37626762
PMCPMC10452074
OpenAlexW4385812523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.