Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37626630›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

A Supervised Learning Regression Method for the Analysis of the Taste Functions of Healthy Controls and Patients with Chemosensory Loss.

Lala Chaimae Naciri, Mariano Mastinu, Melania Melis, Tomer Green, Anne Wolf, Thomas Hummel, Iole Tomassini Barbarossa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lala Chaimae NaciriDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.
Mariano MastinuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3833-9707
Melania MelisDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3410-3158
Tomer GreenInstitute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
Anne WolfDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell & Taste Clinic, Technical University of Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Thomas HummelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell & Taste Clinic, Technical University of Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9713-0183
Iole Tomassini BarbarossaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2849-4052

Funding

EXU-transcelerator B3 grant, TU Dresden to T.HFondazione Sardegna, Italy to Melania melis
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In healthy humans, taste sensitivity varies widely, influencing food selection and nutritional status. Chemosensory loss has been associated with numerous pathological disorders and pharmacological interventions. Reliable psychophysical methods are crucial for analyzing the taste function during routine clinical assessment. However, in the daily clinical routine, they are often considered too time-consuming. We used a supervised learning (SL) regression method to analyze with high precision the overall taste statuses of healthy controls (HCs) and patients with chemosensory loss, and to characterize the combination of responses that would best predict the overall taste statuses of the subjects in the two groups. The random forest regressor model allowed us to achieve our objective. The analysis of the order of importance of each parameter and their impact on the prediction of the overall taste statuses of the subjects in the two groups showed that salty (low-concentration) and sour (high-concentration) stimuli specifically characterized healthy subjects, while bitter (high-concentration) and astringent (high-concentration) stimuli identified patients with chemosensory loss. Although the present results require confirmation in studies with larger samples, the identification of such distinctions should be of interest to the health system because they may justify the use of specific stimuli during the routine clinical assessments of taste function and thereby reduce time and cost commitments.

Indexed as

general taste statusrandom forest regressorsupervised learning regressiontaste loss

Identifiers

PMID37626630
PMCPMC10452470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.