Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37626599›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Pre-Operative SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Asymptomatic Heart Transplantation Recipients.

Peter-Paul Zwetsloot, Wouter L Smit, Niels P Van der Kaaij, Mariusz K Szymanski, Manon G Van der Meer, Linda W Van Laake, Annet Troelstra, Marjolijn C A Wegdam-Blans, Marish I F J Oerlemans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peter-Paul ZwetslootDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wouter L SmitDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Niels P Van der KaaijDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mariusz K SzymanskiDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3110-0226
Manon G Van der MeerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Linda W Van LaakeDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Annet TroelstraDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marjolijn C A Wegdam-BlansDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marish I F J OerlemansDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3166-518X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFrom the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, international guidelines have recommended pre-operative screening for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) before heart transplantation (HTx). Due to the changing prevalence of COVID-19, the chances of false positive results have increased. Because of increased immunity in the population and evolution of SARS-CoV-2 to current Omicron variants, associated mortality and morbidity have decreased. We set out to investigate the yield and side effects of SARS-CoV-2 screening in our center.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study in the University Medical Center Utrecht. The study period was from March 2019 to January 2023. All data from patients who underwent HTx were collected, including all pre-operative and post-operative SARS-CoV-2 tests. Furthermore, all clinical SARS-CoV-2 tests for the indication of potential HTx were screened.

resultsIn the period under study, 51 patients underwent HTx. None of the recipients reported any symptoms of a viral infection. Fifty HTx recipients were screened for SARS-CoV-2. Forty-nine out of fifty patients tested negative. One patient had a false positive result, potentially delaying the HTx procedure. There were no cancelled HTx procedures due to a true positive SARS-CoV-2 test result.

conclusionPre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening in asymptomatic HTx recipients did not lead to any true positive cases. In 2% of the cases, screening resulted in a false positive test result. With the current Omicron variants, in combination with a low-prevalence situation, we propose to abandon pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 screening and initiate a symptom-driven approach for the general viral testing of patients who are called in for a potential HTx.

Indexed as

cardiac transplantCOVID-19pre-operative testingSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37626599
PMCPMC10452735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.