Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37626430›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023

Improving the cytotoxicity of immunotoxins by reducing the affinity of the antibody in acidic pH.

Xiaoyu Liu, Qingqing Tan, Jiaqi Wen, Xufei Wang, Gang Yang, Yuxiao Li, Ming Lu, Wei Ye, Anfeng Si, Sujuan Ma and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoyu Liu *School of Basic Medical Sciences and Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Road, Xuehai Building, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Qingqing Tan *Department of Gynecology Oncology, Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Jiaqi WenSchool of Basic Medical Sciences and Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Road, Xuehai Building, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Xufei WangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences and Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Road, Xuehai Building, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Gang YangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences and Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Road, Xuehai Building, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yuxiao LiDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Ming LuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences and Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Road, Xuehai Building, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Wei YeSchool of Basic Medical Sciences and Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Road, Xuehai Building, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Anfeng SiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 34 Yanggongjing Road, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Sujuan MaSchool of Basic Medical Sciences and Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Road, Xuehai Building, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Tong DingSchool of Basic Medical Sciences and Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Road, Xuehai Building, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Luan SunSchool of Basic Medical Sciences and Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Road, Xuehai Building, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Fang LiuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences and Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Road, Xuehai Building, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Mei ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Tao JiangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 34 Yanggongjing Road, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. jiangsht@126.com.
Wei GaoSchool of Basic Medical Sciences and Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Road, Xuehai Building, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. gao@njmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-1662
Nanjing Medical University · CNNanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNJiangsu Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunotoxins are antibody-toxin conjugates that bind to surface antigens and exert effective cytotoxic activity after internalization into tumor cells. Immunotoxins exhibit effective cytotoxicity and have been approved by the FDA to treat multiple hematological malignancies, such as hairy cell leukemia and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. However, most of the internalized immunotoxin is degraded in lysosomes, and only approximately 5% of free toxin escapes into the cytosol to exert cytotoxicity. Many studies have improved immunotoxins by engineering the toxin fragment to reduce immunogenicity or increase stability, but how the antibody fragment contributes to the activity of immunotoxins has not been well demonstrated.

methodsIn the current study, we used 32A9 and 42A1, two anti-GPC3 antibodies with similar antigen-binding capabilities and internalization rates, to construct scFv-mPE24 immunotoxins and evaluated their in vitro and in vivo antitumor activities. Next, the antigen-binding capacity, trafficking, intracellular protein stability and release of free toxin of 32A9 scFv-mPE24 and 42A1 scFv-mPE24 were compared to elucidate their different antitumor activities. Furthermore, we used a lysosome inhibitor to evaluate the degradation behavior of 32A9 scFv-mPE24 and 42A1 scFv-mPE24. Finally, the antigen-binding patterns of 32A9 and 42A1 were compared under neutral and acidic pH conditions.

resultsAlthough 32A9 and 42A1 had similar antigen binding capacities and internalization rates, 32A9 scFv-mPE24 had superior antitumor activity compared to 42A1 scFv-mPE24. We found that 32A9 scFv-mPE24 exhibited faster degradation and drove efficient free toxin release compared to 42A1 scFv-mPE24. These phenomena were determined by the different degradation behaviors of 32A9 scFv-mPE24 and 42A1 scFv-mPE24 in lysosomes. Moreover, 32A9 was sensitive to the low-pH environment, which made the 32A9 conjugate easily lose antigen binding and undergo degradation in lysosomes, and the free toxin was then efficiently produced to exert cytotoxicity, whereas 42A1 was resistant to the acidic environment, which kept the 42A1 conjugate relatively stable in lysosomes and delayed the release of free toxin.

conclusionsThese results showed that a low pH-sensitive antibody-based immunotoxin degraded faster in lysosomes, caused effective free toxin release, and led to improved cytotoxicity compared to an immunotoxin based on a normal antibody. Our findings suggested that a low pH-sensitive antibody might have an advantage in the design of immunotoxins and other lysosomal degradation-dependent antibody conjugate drugs.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsImmunotoxinsAntibodiesCytosolHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationAntibodiesImmunotoxinsGlypican-3ImmunotoxinLow pH-responsive antigen bindingLysosomal degradationToxin release

Identifiers

PMID37626430
PMCPMC10463491
OpenAlexW4386161546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.