Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37626384›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2023

Separating lymph node stations by the surgeon from the gastric cancer specimen improves the quality of nodal status evaluation.

Aleksi Fernström, Arto Kokkola, Akseli Korpela, Pauli Puolakkainen, Johanna Louhimo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aleksi FernströmAbdominal Center, Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Meilahti Hospital, PO Box 440, Stenbäckinkatu 9A, Helsinki, 00029 HUS, Finland.
Arto KokkolaAbdominal Center, Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Meilahti Hospital, PO Box 440, Stenbäckinkatu 9A, Helsinki, 00029 HUS, Finland.
Akseli KorpelaAbdominal Center, Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Meilahti Hospital, PO Box 440, Stenbäckinkatu 9A, Helsinki, 00029 HUS, Finland.
Pauli PuolakkainenAbdominal Center, Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Meilahti Hospital, PO Box 440, Stenbäckinkatu 9A, Helsinki, 00029 HUS, Finland.
Johanna LouhimoAbdominal Center, Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Meilahti Hospital, PO Box 440, Stenbäckinkatu 9A, Helsinki, 00029 HUS, Finland. johanna.louhimo@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6208-978X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn gastric cancer (GC), the pN-stage is an important prognostic factor influencing treatment. Along with the depth of invasion of the tumor, the presence of nodal metastases is one of the most important prognostic factors guiding treatment strategies in gastric cancer. Examining a small number of lymph nodes may lead to understaging of the disease; hence, it is essential for the nodal status to be precisely assessed. In this study, we explored whether dissecting lymph node stations into separate samples by the surgeon from the gastric cancer surgical specimen affects the quality of nodal status evaluation and patient outcome.

methodsThe clinical data of 130 GC patients treated at the Helsinki University Hospital between 2016 and 2019 was reviewed. The performed operations included 59 total and 71 subtotal gastrectomies. The processing of the surgical specimen before the pathological examination was assessed from the operation records and pathology reports. The association of the number of examined lymph nodes with other variables was assessed, and multivariate survival analysis was performed to explore the independent prognostic factors in disease-specific survival.

resultsDissecting lymph node stations into separate specimens before pathological evaluation yielded a significantly greater number of examined lymph nodes compared with a specimen without intervention (median 34.5 vs 21.0, p < 0.001). The pT-stage, the pN-stage, and the extent of lymphadenectomy were identified as independent prognostic factors, whereas dissecting the specimen's lymph node stations did not associate with survival.

conclusionsDissecting lymph node stations into separate specimens results in a greater number of examined lymph nodes, which has the potential to lead to a more reliable pN-stage assessment.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsSurgeonsGastrectomyHumansLymph NodesGastric cancerLymph node stationsNodal statusN-stagePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID37626384
PMCPMC10463918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.