Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37626335›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2023

Inequities in referrals to a breast cancer risk assessment and prevention clinic: a mixed methods study.

Claire B King, Brittany L Bychkovsky, Erica T Warner, Tari A King, Rachel A Freedman, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Fisher Katlin, Anna Revette, Danielle M Crookes, Neil Maniar and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Claire B KingComprehensive Breast Health Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Brittany L BychkovskyComprehensive Breast Health Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Erica T WarnerHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Tari A KingComprehensive Breast Health Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Rachel A FreedmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth A MittendorfComprehensive Breast Health Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Fisher KatlinComprehensive Breast Health Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Anna RevetteDivision of Population Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Danielle M CrookesDepartment of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Neil ManiarDepartment of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Lydia E PaceComprehensive Breast Health Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. lpace@bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInequitable access to personalized breast cancer screening and prevention may compound racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes. The Breast Cancer Personalized Risk Assessment, Education and Prevention (B-PREP) program, located within the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) Comprehensive Breast Health Center (BHC), provides care to patients at high risk for developing breast cancer. We sought to characterize the differences between BWH primary care patients referred specifically to B-PREP for risk evaluation and those referred to the BHC for benign breast conditions. Through interviews with primary care clinicians, we sought to explore contributors to potentially inequitable B-PREP referral patterns.

methodsWe used electronic health record data and the B-PREP clinical database to identify patients referred by primary care clinicians to the BHC or B-PREP between 2017 and 2020. We examined associations with likelihood of referral to B-PREP for risk assessment. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine primary care clinicians from six clinics to explore referral patterns.

resultsOf 1789 patients, 78.0% were referred for benign breast conditions, and 21.5% for risk assessment. In multivariable analyses, Black individuals were less likely to be referred for risk than for benign conditions (OR 0.38, 95% CI:0.23-0.63) as were those with Medicaid/Medicare (OR 0.72, 95% CI:0.53-0.98; OR 0.52, 95% CI:0.27-0.99) and those whose preferred language was not English (OR 0.26, 95% CI:0.12-0.57). Interviewed clinicians described inconsistent approaches to risk assessment and variable B-PREP awareness.

conclusionsIn this single-site evaluation, among individuals referred by primary care clinicians for specialized breast care, Black, publicly-insured patients, and those whose preferred language was not English were less likely to be referred for risk assessment. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Interventions to standardize breast cancer risk assessment in primary care may improve equity.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAgedBreastFemaleHumansMedicareReferral and ConsultationRisk AssessmentUnited StatesBreast cancerHealth equityPreventionReferralsRisk evaluationScreening

Identifiers

PMID37626335
PMCPMC10464083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.