Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37626329›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2023

Recognition of visual symptoms in stroke: a challenge to patients, bystanders, and Emergency Medical Services.

Kristina Parsberg Berg, Viktor Frederik Idin Sørensen, Stig Nikolaj Fasmer Blomberg, Helle Collatz Christensen, Christina Kruuse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Eye-related emergency calls and prehospital management in region Zealand, Danmark: a register-based cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. The competency requirements for emergency medical services call takers and dispatchers - a scoping review.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristina Parsberg BergDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Viktor Frederik Idin SørensenDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stig Nikolaj Fasmer BlombergEmergency Medical Services Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Telegrafvej 5, 2750, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helle Collatz Christensen *Emergency Medical Services Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Telegrafvej 5, 2750, Copenhagen, Denmark. helle.collatz.christensen.02@regionh.dk.
Christina Kruuse *Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKGentofte Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of visual symptoms as a sign of acute stroke can be challenging for both first line healthcare professionals and lay persons. Failed recognition of visual symptoms by medical dispatchers at the Emergency Medical Dispatch Center (EMDC-112) or personnel at the Out-of-Hours Health Service (OOHS) may delay stroke revascularization. We aimed to identify correct system response to visual symptoms in emergency calls.

methodsPhone calls from patient or bystander to the EMDC-112 or OOHS, which included visual symptoms on patients later verified with stroke/Transient ischemic attack (TIA) diagnosis, were analyzed. Data were stratified according to hospitalization within and after 4.5 h from symptom onset. Descriptive and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed.

resultsOf 517 calls identified, 290 calls fulfilled inclusion criteria. Only 30% of the patients received correct visitation by the medical dispatchers and referral to the hospital by a high-priority ambulance. Correct visitation was associated with early contact (adjusted OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.11, 5.03), contact to the EMDC-112 (adjusted OR: 3.18, 95% CI: 1.80, 5.62), and when the medical dispatcher asked additional questions on typical stroke symptoms (adjusted OR: 6.36, 95% CI: 3.01, 13.43). No specific visual symptom was associated with stroke recognition and fast hospitalization.

conclusionsFirst line healthcare professionals had significant problems in identifying visual symptoms as a sign of acute stroke and eliciting correct response. This highlights an urgent need to improve knowledge of visual symptoms in acute stroke and emphasize correct response to stroke symptoms in general.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesIschemic Attack, TransientStrokeAmbulancesHospitalsHumansEmergency Medical Services; stroke recognitionPrehospitalStrokeVisual symptoms

Identifiers

PMID37626329
PMCPMC10463357
OpenAlexW4386167698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.