ArticleBMC nursing2023
Construction of an evaluation index system for undergraduate nursing teachers' curriculum humanistic competence: a Delphi study in China.
Article in BMC nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A mixed-methods study of a "Humanities in Course" model: improving caring abilities, climate, and satisfaction in pediatric nursing education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Development of an evaluation indicator system for wound care quality based on the structure-process-outcome model: a mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Application of an AI-enhanced interactive virtual clinical reasoning training system in orthodontic residency training.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development of nursing quality evaluation indicators system for pressure injury in orthopedics based on the Donabedian model: a Delphi study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Development of core competency evaluation index system for informatics nurses in China: a Delphi study.BMJ open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe curriculum humanistic competence of nursing teachers is important to cultivate the humanistic qualities of undergraduate nursing students. However, there are no evaluation tools for the curriculum humanistic competence of undergraduate nursing teachers in China.
objectiveTo develop an index system to evaluate the curriculum humanistic competence of undergraduate nursing teachers.
designThis research conducted a Delphi study.
participantsSemi-structured interviews were held with 19 experts, and Delphi rounds were conducted with 18 experts. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in 12 universities and 4 Grade A tertiary hospitals in China.
methodsA literature review and semi-structured interviews were conducted to develop an initial framework. A two-round Delphi survey was employed to build the index system for undergraduate nursing teachers' curriculum humanistic competence.
resultsAfter two rounds of consultation, the index system included 5 first-level indicators, 11 second-level indicators and 41 third-level indicators. The Cr for two rounds of consultation were 0.929 and 0.923, and Kendall's W was 0.152(P<0.001).
conclusionsThe index system for the evaluation of undergraduate nursing teachers' curriculum humanistic competence offers guidelines for undergraduate nursing teachers in China. It can be used in practice to develop high humanistic qualities in undergraduate nursing teachers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.