Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37626277›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

Tradeoffs of estimating reaction time with absolute and relative thresholds.

Jarrod Blinch, Coby Trovinger, Callie R DeWinne, Guilherme de Cellio Martins, Chelsea N Ifediora, Maryam Nourollahimoghadam, John R Harry, Ty B Palmer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jarrod BlinchDepartment of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA. jarrod.blinch@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4016-2832
Coby TrovingerDepartment of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Callie R DeWinneDepartment of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Guilherme de Cellio MartinsDepartment of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Chelsea N IfedioraDepartment of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Maryam NourollahimoghadamDepartment of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
John R HarryDepartment of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Ty B PalmerDepartment of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring the duration of cognitive processing with reaction time is fundamental to several subfields of psychology. Many methods exist for estimating movement initiation when measuring reaction time, but there is an incomplete understanding of their relative performance. The purpose of the present study was to identify and compare the tradeoffs of 19 estimates of movement initiation across two experiments. We focused our investigation on estimating movement initiation on each trial with filtered kinematic and kinetic data. Nine of the estimates involved absolute thresholds (e.g., acceleration 1000 back to 200 mm/s

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMovementYoung AdultKinematicsKineticsMovement amplitudeMovement initiationReaction time

Identifiers

PMID37626277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.