ReviewHNO2023
[Psychosomatic aspects in otorhinolaryngology-historical milestones].
Review in HNO, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychosomatics in ENT.HNO · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis investigation examined the development of psychosomatics in the field of otolaryngology in Germany using the examples of psychogenic deafness and chronic tinnitus by means of literature research. The focus of the study was on the period 1948-2022.
methodsA literature search was carried out in the PubMed database from 1948 and antiquarian ENT textbooks were evaluated. The search terms used were "ENT and psychosomatics," "tinnitus," "retraining therapy," "analytical psychology," "behavioral therapy," and "sensory systems."
resultsPsychosomatic phenomena were mentioned in the treatment of nasal diseases and ear ailments in writings of Byzantine and medieval medicine. Even older are references to tinnitus in ancient Egyptian and Indian scripts. From the nineteenth to the mid-twentieth century, psychological abnormalities in ENT symptoms were assigned to the term hysteria. From the middle of the twentieth century, a paradigm shift in the assessment of psychosomatic disorders in otolaryngology became apparent. In the 1950s, a broad psychosomatic discussion was opened in individual lectures and book contributions on mental abnormalities in ENT diseases. With the implementation of the Psychosomatics Working Group of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, psychosomatics in the field of ENT received the framework for scientific and clinical activity at the turn of the millennium. Psychosomatics is scientifically represented and part of the continuing education regulations for otolaryngology in Germany and at European level. It shows high standards in research, qualification of otolaryngologists, and patient care.
conclusionAs of 2022, psychosomatics in otolaryngology has been steadily developing for over 70 years. The standards achieved are to be further expanded and research on cognition, affectivity, and sensory analogies intensified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.