Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37626246›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2023

Precise genome engineering in Pseudomonas using phage-encoded homologous recombination and the Cascade-Cas3 system.

Wentao Zheng, Yandong Xia, Xue Wang, Shiqing Gao, Diao Zhou, Vinothkannan Ravichandran, Chanjuan Jiang, Qiang Tu, Yulong Yin, Youming Zhang and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A diverse single-stranded DNA-annealing protein library enables efficient genome editing across bacterial phyla.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Multidrug-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Genetically engineeredFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wentao Zheng *State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Yandong Xia *Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Xue WangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Shiqing GaoState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Diao ZhouHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Vinothkannan RavichandranState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Chanjuan JiangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Qiang TuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Yulong YinHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Youming ZhangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Jun FuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, China. fujun@sdu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5120-4674
Ruijuan LiState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, China. liruijuan@sdu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-2278-4622
Jia YinHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Function and Regulation, Hunan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Intestinal Ecology and Health, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China. jiayin@hunnu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-8867-3490
Shandong University · CNHunan Normal University · CNCentral South University of Forestry and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lack of generic and effective genetic manipulation methods for Pseudomonas has restricted fundamental research and utilization of this genus for biotechnology applications. Phage-encoded homologous recombination (PEHR) is an efficient tool for bacterial genome engineering. This PEHR system is based on a lambda Red-like operon (BAS) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa phage Ab31 and a Rac bacteriophage RecET-like operon (Rec-TE

Indexed as

BacteriophagesCRISPR-Associated ProteinsAllelesHomologous RecombinationHumansPseudomonasCRISPR-Associated Proteins

Identifiers

PMID37626246
OpenAlexW4386161118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.