Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37625439›Full record

ArticlePneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany)2025

Criteria for evaluation of response to biologics in severe asthma - the Biologics Asthma Response Score (BARS).

Katrin Milger, Stephanie Korn, Claudia Feder, Jan Fuge, Andreas Mühle, Wolfgang Schütte, Dirk Skowasch, Hartmut Timmermann, Hendrik Suhling

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Katrin MilgerMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik V, LMU Klinikum, München, Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), Mitglied des Deutschen Zentrums für Lungenforschung (DZL).
Stephanie KornInstitut für Klinische Forschung, Mainz.
Claudia FederKlinik für Innere Medizin V, Universitätsklinikum Jena.
Jan FugeDeutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Standort Hannover.
Andreas MühlePneumologisches Facharztzentrum Teuchern.
Wolfgang SchütteKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau.
Dirk SkowaschMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II - Pneumologie, Herzzentrum des Universitätsklinikums Bonn.
Hartmut TimmermannSchwerpunktpraxis Colonnaden, Hamburg.
Hendrik SuhlingKlinik für Pneumologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover.
German Center for Lung Research · DEHeidelberg University · DEJena University Hospital · DELMU Klinikum · DEMartha-Maria Hospital · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEPraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe introduction of monoclonal antibodies (biologics) has revolutionized the therapy of severe asthma. Even though there is a response in the majority of patients, the degree of response varies. To date criteria for assessment of response to biologics are not consistently defined.

aimTo define criteria for evaluation of response to biologics that are precise, simple and suitable for daily use in order to guide decision-making regarding continuation, switching or stopping of biological therapy.

methods8 physicians with large experience in this indication, supported by a data-scientist, developed a consensus on criteria to evaluate response to biologics in patients with severe asthma.

resultWe developed a combined score based on current literature, own experience and practicability. It uses the main criteria exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy and asthma control (asthma control test, ACT). We defined thresholds for "good response", "response" and "insufficient response" rated with a score of "2", "1" and "0" respectively: annual exacerbations ("0 or reduction ≥ 75 %", "reduction 50-74 %", "reductio < 50 %"), daily OCS dose ("stopping or reduction ≥ 75 %", "reduction 50-74 %", "reduction < 50 %"), asthma control ("ACT increase ≥ 6 or ≥ 3 with result ≥ 20", "ACT increase 3-5 with result < 20", "ACT increase < 3"). Additional individual criteria like lung function and comorbidities may be important for evaluation of response. We propose 3, 6 and 12 months timepoint for assessment of tolerability and response. Using the combined score, we developed a scheme to guide the decision whether switching the biologic should be considered.

conclusionThe Biologic Asthma Response Score (BARS) serves as objective and simple tool to evaluate response to biologic therapy using the three main criteria exacerbations, OCS use and asthma control. A validation of the score was initiated.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaBiological ProductsOutcome Assessment, Health CareSeverity of Illness IndexGermanyHumansReproducibility of ResultsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID37625439
PMCPMC12202053
OpenAlexW4386155067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.