ArticlePneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany)2025
Criteria for evaluation of response to biologics in severe asthma - the Biologics Asthma Response Score (BARS).
Article in Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship between knowledge, adherence-related behaviors and self-management with response to monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with severe asthma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Targeting the Epithelial Alarmin Pathway with Tezepelumab in Highly Comorbid, Biologic-Experienced Severe Asthma: 52-Week Real-World Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of sputum neutrophilia on the efficacy of biologics in severe asthma.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
- Influence of genetic polymorphisms on omalizumab clinical response in pediatric severe asthma: a pilot study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Secondary Non-Response to Biologic Treatment in Patients with Severe Asthma.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2025Article
- Long-term multicenter comparison shows equivalent efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in severe asthma therapy.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- The Influence of Emphysema on Treatment Response to Biologic Therapy in Severe Asthma.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2024Article
- Initiation, response assessment, and switch of antibody therapies in patients with severe asthma - A survey among German specialists.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023Article
- Relationship Between the Response to Antibody Therapy and Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Patients with Severe Asthma.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe introduction of monoclonal antibodies (biologics) has revolutionized the therapy of severe asthma. Even though there is a response in the majority of patients, the degree of response varies. To date criteria for assessment of response to biologics are not consistently defined.
aimTo define criteria for evaluation of response to biologics that are precise, simple and suitable for daily use in order to guide decision-making regarding continuation, switching or stopping of biological therapy.
methods8 physicians with large experience in this indication, supported by a data-scientist, developed a consensus on criteria to evaluate response to biologics in patients with severe asthma.
resultWe developed a combined score based on current literature, own experience and practicability. It uses the main criteria exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy and asthma control (asthma control test, ACT). We defined thresholds for "good response", "response" and "insufficient response" rated with a score of "2", "1" and "0" respectively: annual exacerbations ("0 or reduction ≥ 75 %", "reduction 50-74 %", "reductio < 50 %"), daily OCS dose ("stopping or reduction ≥ 75 %", "reduction 50-74 %", "reduction < 50 %"), asthma control ("ACT increase ≥ 6 or ≥ 3 with result ≥ 20", "ACT increase 3-5 with result < 20", "ACT increase < 3"). Additional individual criteria like lung function and comorbidities may be important for evaluation of response. We propose 3, 6 and 12 months timepoint for assessment of tolerability and response. Using the combined score, we developed a scheme to guide the decision whether switching the biologic should be considered.
conclusionThe Biologic Asthma Response Score (BARS) serves as objective and simple tool to evaluate response to biologic therapy using the three main criteria exacerbations, OCS use and asthma control. A validation of the score was initiated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.