ArticleNursing research
Predictors of Fertility-Awareness-Based Method Use Among Women Trying to Conceive and Women Contemplating Pregnancy.
Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fertility awareness in 97,414 women trying to conceive: gaps, misconceptions, and implications for reproductive education.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- A Novel Machine Learning Model for Predicting Natural Conception Using Non-Laboratory-Based Data.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025Article
- Survey Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Menstrual Cycle Tracking Technologies.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFertility-awareness-based methods have been linked to shorter time to conception; however, little is known about the predictors of fertility-awareness-based method use among women who are currently or will soon be trying to conceive.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to identify predictors of fertility-awareness-based methods use among women trying to conceive or contemplating pregnancy within the next year.
methodsWomen participating in the Nurses' Health Study 3 were asked if they were trying to become pregnant or contemplating pregnancy and whether they are using fertility-awareness-based methods. Multivariable negative binomial regression was used to identify predictors for a number of fertility-awareness-based methods used.
resultsAmong the 23,418 women asked about pregnancy intention since 2015, 955 were trying to conceive, and 2,282 were contemplating pregnancy within the next year. The three most used fertility-awareness-based methods among women trying to conceive were menstrual cycle tracking, ovulation prediction kits, and cervical mucus monitoring. Among women contemplating pregnancy, the three most commonly used methods were menstrual cycle tracking, cervical mucus monitoring, and basal body temperature monitoring. The ongoing duration of pregnancy attempts and gravidity were associated with the number of methods used among women actively trying to conceive. When compared with women who were trying for 2 months or less, the number of methods was 29% higher when trying for 3-5 months, 45% higher when trying for 6-12 months, and 38% higher when trying for more than 1 year. Compared with nulligravid women, the number of methods was lower for women with a history of two or more pregnancies. Among women contemplating pregnancy, those who were married or in a domestic partnership used more fertility-awareness-based methods than unpartnered women. No other significant predictors of fertility-awareness-based method use were identified. DISCUSSION: Duration of ongoing pregnancy attempt and gravidity were the only significant predictors for the number of fertility-awareness-based methods used among women actively trying to conceive, whereas partnership was the only significant predictor of the number of fertility-awareness-based methods among women contemplating pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.