Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37625162›Full record

ArticleJMIR dermatology2021

Patient Factors Associated with Interest in Teledermatology: Cross-sectional Survey.

Maham Ghani, Colin Adler, Howa Yeung

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bridging the gap through telemedicine: Pilot study on the acceptance and use of teledermatology for urticaria.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maham Ghani *City University of New York School of Medicine, City University of New York, New york, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9063-5661
Colin Adler *Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8204-1687
Howa YeungDepartment of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4815-4936
Emory University · USCity University of New York · US

Funding

NIAMS NIH HHS L30 AR076081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeledermatology is a conduit for patients communicating with dermatologists on the internet, which bypasses in-person visits. It holds promise to address access needs for dermatologic care; however, the interest in using teledermatology is unknown in underserved populations with potential barriers to the use of health care technology.

objectiveThis study aimed to characterize the association between demographic characteristics with interest in exchanging digital images or videos of skin lesions with health care providers electronically.

methodsWe examined data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 4 cycle 4 (2014) of the National Cancer Institute. HINTS is a cross-sectional, nationally representative household survey conducted annually, which collects information on demographics, perceptions and use of health information, and provides information on how cancer risks are perceived. HINTS 4 cycle 4 had a sample of 3677 participants. We examined the outcome to the question, "how interested are you in exchanging digital images or videos (eg, photos of skin lesions) with a health care provider electronically?" We dichotomized the outcome by a high level of interest (responding with "very") and those who did not have a high level of interest (responding with "somewhat," "a little," or "not at all") in exchanging images or videos. We used a multivariable logistic regression model developed through backwards selection, with all final covariates associated with varying levels of teledermatology use at P<.05. Sensitivity analysis was performed by changing the outcome dichotomy to model those who were "not at all" interested. Two-sided tests were performed with P<.05 considered significant.

resultsAmong 3447 respondents, 888 (weighted prevalence=26.2%) were "very" interested in participating in teledermatology. A higher interest in using teledermatology was associated with a younger age, higher educational attainment, higher household income, internet usage, type of mobile device ownership, history of electronic medical information exchange with a clinician within the past 12 months, and high level of trust in web-based information on cancer (for all, P<.01), but not with the female gender, race or ethnicity, health insurance status, or having a regular medical provider.

conclusionsModifiable access barriers to teledermatology adoption include trust, experience with teledermatology, and use of health apps. Teledermatology program implementation should address these specific factors within the digital divide to promote equitable access to care across diverse patient populations.

Indexed as

DermatologyTelemedicineAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSkin DiseasesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adultdigital dividee-health literacyInternetmodifiable behaviorsteledermatology

Identifiers

PMID37625162
PMCPMC10501513
OpenAlexW3155354651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.