Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37625107›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

Financial Toxicity Monitoring in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient-Reported Outcomes During Cancer Treatment (Alliance AFT-39).

Victoria S Blinder, Allison M Deal, Brenda Ginos, Jennifer Jansen, Amylou C Dueck, Gina L Mazza, Sydney Henson, Philip Carr, Lauren J Rogak, Anna Weiss and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Family Experiences of Financial Hardship after Critical Illness.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria S BlinderMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-1448-8671
Allison M DealLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-3526-3938
Brenda GinosAlliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Jennifer JansenLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Amylou C DueckAlliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.ORCID 0000-0002-9912-1085
Gina L MazzaAlliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.ORCID 0000-0002-5305-6193
Sydney HensonLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Philip CarrLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Lauren J RogakMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Anna WeissBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Anna RapperportThe Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Boston, MA.
Mattias JonssonLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Patricia A SpearsLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
David CellaRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-9881-4541
Francesca GanyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-0684-2367
Deborah SchragMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Ethan BaschLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-3813-9318
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USAlliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI David Darr · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareUG1CA233180 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Harold John Burstein · 2019 to 2026
$8.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFinancial toxicity (FT) affects 20% of cancer survivors and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. No large-scale programs have been implemented to mitigate FT. We evaluated the effect of monthly FT screening as part of a larger patient-reported outcomes (PROs) digital monitoring intervention.

methodsPRO-TECT (AFT-39) is a cluster-randomized trial of patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic cancer. Practices were randomly assigned 1:1 to digital symptom monitoring (PRO practices) or usual care (control practices). Digital monitoring consisted of between-visit online or automated telephone patient surveys about symptoms, functioning, and FT (single-item screening question from Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity) for up to 1 year, with automated alerts sent to practice nurses for concerning survey scores. Clinical team actions in response to alerts were not mandated. The primary outcome of this planned secondary analysis was development or worsening of financial difficulties, assessed via the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 financial difficulties measure, at any time compared with baseline. A randomly selected subset of patients and nurses were interviewed about their experiences with the intervention.

resultsOne thousand one hundred ninety-one patients were enrolled (593 PRO; 598 control) at 52 US community oncology practices. Overall, 30.2% of patients treated at practices that received the FT screening intervention developed, or experienced worsening of, financial difficulties, compared with 39.0% treated at control practices (

conclusionIn this report of a secondary outcome from a randomized clinical trial, FT screening as part of routine digital patient monitoring with PROs reduced the development, or worsening, of financial difficulties among patients undergoing systemic cancer therapy.

Indexed as

Financial StressNeoplasmsHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID37625107
PMCPMC10564309
OpenAlexW4386157158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.