Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37625010›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2023

Evaluating Scalable Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand Chemical Libraries.

Moayad Alnammi, Shengchao Liu, Spencer S Ericksen, Gene E Ananiev, Andrew F Voter, Song Guo, James L Keck, F Michael Hoffmann, Scott A Wildman, Anthony Gitter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Moayad AlnammiDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Shengchao LiuDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Spencer S EricksenSmall Molecule Screening Facility, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4907-1160
Gene E AnanievSmall Molecule Screening Facility, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States.
Andrew F VoterDepartment of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Song GuoSmall Molecule Screening Facility, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States.
James L KeckDepartment of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
F Michael HoffmannSmall Molecule Screening Facility, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States.
Scott A WildmanSmall Molecule Screening Facility, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8598-0751
Anthony GitterDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5324-9833

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
TrainingU54AI117924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CRAVEN, MARK W. · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
Integrated Training For Physician-ScientistsT32GM140935 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Anna Huttenlocher, Jeniel E Nett · 2021 to 2026
$6.5M
A Machine Learning Platform for Adaptive Chemical ScreeningR01GM135631 · NIGMS · MORGRIDGE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH, INC. · PI GITTER, ANTHONY JAMES · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
Identification of chemosensitizing agents that block DNA repair by the Fanconi Anemia/Bloom Dissolvasome complexF30CA210465 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI VOTER, ANDREW FORD · 2016 to 2019
$118k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA210465NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI117924NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135631NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM140935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional small-molecule drug discovery is a time-consuming and costly endeavor. High-throughput chemical screening can only assess a tiny fraction of drug-like chemical space. The strong predictive power of modern machine-learning methods for virtual chemical screening enables training models on known active and inactive compounds and extrapolating to much larger chemical libraries. However, there has been limited experimental validation of these methods in practical applications on large commercially available or synthesize-on-demand chemical libraries. Through a prospective evaluation with the bacterial protein-protein interaction PriA-SSB, we demonstrate that ligand-based virtual screening can identify many active compounds in large commercial libraries. We use cross-validation to compare different types of supervised learning models and select a random forest (RF) classifier as the best model for this target. When predicting the activity of more than 8 million compounds from Aldrich Market Select, the RF substantially outperforms a naïve baseline based on chemical structure similarity. 48% of the RF's 701 selected compounds are active. The RF model easily scales to score one billion compounds from the synthesize-on-demand Enamine REAL database. We tested 68 chemically diverse top predictions from Enamine REAL and observed 31 hits (46%), including one with an IC

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysSmall Molecule LibrariesDatabases, FactualDrug DiscoverySupervised Machine LearningSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID37625010
PMCPMC10538940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.