ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2023
Evaluating Scalable Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand Chemical Libraries.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein-Protein Interactions as Promising Molecular Targets for Novel Antimicrobials Aimed at Gram-Negative Bacteria.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Chemical Language Model Linker: Blending Text and Molecules with Modular Adapters.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Article
- Natural products as drug leads: exploring their potential in drug discovery and development.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Active learning driven prioritisation of compounds from on-demand libraries targeting the SARS-CoV-2 main protease.Digital discovery · 2025Article
- Data mining of PubChem bioassay records reveals diverse OXPHOS inhibitory chemotypes as potential therapeutic agents against ovarian cancer.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
- Structural Adaptation of the Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein C-Terminal to DNA Metabolizing Partners Guides Inhibitor Design.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional small-molecule drug discovery is a time-consuming and costly endeavor. High-throughput chemical screening can only assess a tiny fraction of drug-like chemical space. The strong predictive power of modern machine-learning methods for virtual chemical screening enables training models on known active and inactive compounds and extrapolating to much larger chemical libraries. However, there has been limited experimental validation of these methods in practical applications on large commercially available or synthesize-on-demand chemical libraries. Through a prospective evaluation with the bacterial protein-protein interaction PriA-SSB, we demonstrate that ligand-based virtual screening can identify many active compounds in large commercial libraries. We use cross-validation to compare different types of supervised learning models and select a random forest (RF) classifier as the best model for this target. When predicting the activity of more than 8 million compounds from Aldrich Market Select, the RF substantially outperforms a naïve baseline based on chemical structure similarity. 48% of the RF's 701 selected compounds are active. The RF model easily scales to score one billion compounds from the synthesize-on-demand Enamine REAL database. We tested 68 chemically diverse top predictions from Enamine REAL and observed 31 hits (46%), including one with an IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.