Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37624934›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2023

Effect of the supplementation with a combination of plant extracts on sow and piglet performance and physiology during lactation and around weaning.

Lucile Herve, Hélène Quesnel, Amaury Greuter, Laurent Hugonin, Elodie Merlot, Nathalie Le Floc'h

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. DietaryAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Article
  5. Veterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Effect ofTranslational animal science · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact of dietaryFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  11. Dietary supplementation ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucile HervePEGASE, Institut Agro, INRAE, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1638-6361
Hélène QuesnelPEGASE, Institut Agro, INRAE, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France.
Amaury GreuterIDENA, 44880 Sautron, France.
Laurent HugoninIDENA, 44880 Sautron, France.
Elodie MerlotPEGASE, Institut Agro, INRAE, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France.
Nathalie Le Floc'hPEGASE, Institut Agro, INRAE, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France.

Funding

Région Pays de la Loire OHC2P, 2018-06850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weaning is a critical period for pigs. Some plant extracts showing antioxidant, anti-inflammatory or antibacterial properties, provided to piglets and/or their dam, may improve piglets' robustness at weaning, thus reducing the need for antobiotics. This study investigated the effects of a maternal and/or a direct supplementation of piglets with a combination of plant extracts on sow and piglet performance and their metabolic, immune, inflammatory, and oxidative status during lactation and around weaning. Sixty-four sows were assigned to the control or treated group. Treated sows were supplemented with a powdered plant extracts supplement daily top-dressed on feed from day of gestation (DG) 106 to day of lactation (DL) 28 and a liquid solution top-dressed on feed on DG109. Within each sow group, litters were divided into two groups: a control piglet group and a treated piglet group. A single dose of a liquid solution was orally given to piglets in the treated piglet group. Piglets were weaned on DL28. Blood samples were collected from sows on DG94, DG112, and DL26 and from 2 piglets per litter on DL3, DL14, DL25, and 5 d postweaning to analyze indicators of metabolic, immune, inflammatory, and oxidative status. Colostrum and milk samples were collected at farrowing, DL6, and 26. Maternal supplementation had no effect on sow metabolic, immune, inflammatory, and oxidative status except for fewer lymphocytes on DG112 (P < 0.05) and a lower plasma concentration of non-esterified fatty acids on DL26 (P < 0.05). Maternal supplementation tended to decrease dry matter and gross energy (P < 0.10) and reduced fat and haptoglobin concentrations (P < 0.01) in milk on DL26. Maternal supplementation had no effect on piglets' growth performance and blood indicators during lactation and around weaning. On DL25, the direct supplementation of piglets decreased their neutrophils proportion (P < 0.05), increased the expression of genes encoding pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in whole blood culture in response to lipopolysaccharide (P < 0.05) and tended to decrease the oxidative stress index (P = 0.06). After weaning, these beneficial effects were no longer observed but the supplementation improved piglets' growth performance during the postweaning period (P < 0.05). Plant extract supplementation could thus modify the composition of mammary secretions and improve postweaning performance of piglets potentially related to the modification of their immune and oxidative status before weaning.

Indexed as

Body FluidsLactationAnimalsDietary SupplementsFemaleMilkSwineWeaningcolostrumessential oilgrowth performancemilkplant extractweaning

Identifiers

PMID37624934
PMCPMC10494875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.