Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37624860›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

An antimicrobial blue light device to manage infection at the skin-implant interface of percutaneous osseointegrated implants.

Jemi Ong, Alexa Nazarian, Joshua Tam, William Farinelli, Sandeep Korupolu, Lynn Drake, Brad Isaacson, Paul Pasquina, Dustin Williams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Rabbit model of a biofilm-contaminated, percutaneous orthopaedic endoprosthesis.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jemi OngDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0972-5054
Alexa NazarianWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Joshua TamWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
William FarinelliWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Sandeep KorupoluWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Lynn DrakeWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Brad IsaacsonDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Paul PasquinaThe Center for Rehabilitation Sciences Research, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2898-0082
Dustin WilliamsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial blue light (aBL) is an attractive option for managing biofilm burden at the skin-implant interface of percutaneous osseointegrated (OI) implants. However, marketed aBL devices have both structural and optical limitations that prevent them from being used in an OI implant environment. They must be handheld, preventing even irradiation of the entire skin-implant interface, and the devices do not offer sufficient optical power outputs required to kill biofilms. We present the developmental process of a unique aBL device that overcomes these limitations. Four prototypes are detailed, each being a progressive improvement from the previous iteration as we move from proof-of-concept to in vivo application. Design features focused on a cooling system, LED orientation, modularity, and "sheep-proofing". The final prototype was tested in an in vivo OI implant sheep model, demonstrating that it was structurally and optically adequate to address biofilm burdens at the skin-implant of percutaneous OI implants. The device made it possible to test aBL in the unique OI implant environment and compare its efficacy to clinical antibiotics-data which had not before been achievable. It has provided insight into whether or not continued pursual of light therapy research for OI implants, and other percutaneous devices, is worthwhile. However, the device has drawbacks concerning the cooling system, complexity, and size if it is to be translated to human clinical trials. Overall, we successfully developed a device to test aBL therapy for patients with OI implants and helped progress understanding in the field of infection management strategies.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBone-Anchored ProsthesisAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansLightProstheses and ImplantsSheepAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID37624860
PMCPMC10456172
OpenAlexW4386156757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.