Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37624775›Full record

SynthesisBlood advances2023

Treatment strategy for acquired pure red cell aplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hervé Lobbes, Jean-Christophe Lega, Guillaume Le Guenno, Marc Ruivard, Sabine Mainbourg

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Favorable response to second-line sirolimus regardless ofTherapeutic advances in hematology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hervé LobbesService de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Estaing, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Centre de Compétence des cytopénies autoimmunes de l'adulte, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8511-8432
Jean-Christophe LegaLyon Immunopathology Federation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9398-2968
Guillaume Le GuennoService de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Estaing, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Centre de Compétence des cytopénies autoimmunes de l'adulte, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7724-4607
Marc RuivardService de Médecine Interne, Hôpital Estaing, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Centre de Compétence des cytopénies autoimmunes de l'adulte, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Sabine MainbourgLyon Immunopathology Federation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4564-2931

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of autoimmune acquired pure red cell aplasia (aPRCA) is challenging. Guidelines are based on expert recommendations in the absence of controlled trials. We assessed the efficacy of the main treatment strategy through a systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to September 2022. The overall response rate (ORR) was pooled using random-effects models. In total, 24 observational studies (19 retrospective, median follow-up of 48 months) encompassing 753 patients (49% male) were included. Primary aPRCA represented 57% of the cases. The risk of bias was moderate to high using the ROBINS-I tool. Substantial heterogeneity (I2 > 50%) was retrieved. Corticosteroids as monotherapy as first-line treatment (186 patients, 13 studies) provided an ORR of 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34-60). Cyclosporine A was the most frequently used immunosuppressant agent (384 patients, 18 studies), providing an ORR of 74% (95% CI, 66-82) with a similar ORR in first- (73%) and second-line (76%) treatment and when cyclosporin was used as monotherapy (83%) or with corticosteroids (77%). A total of 112 patients (10 studies) received cyclophosphamide, with an ORR of 49% (95% CI, 35-64), which was higher when cyclophosphamide was combined with corticosteroids (48%) and used in second-line treatment (58%) than in monotherapy (31%), and in first-line treatment (44%). Sirolimus use was reported only after cyclosporine A failure and provided an ORR of 87% (95% CI, 68-100; 64 patients, 3 studies). Substantial uncertainty remains regarding the best treatment strategy in the absence of high-quality evidence. This study was registered on the PROPERO database as #CRD42022360452.

Indexed as

CyclosporineRed-Cell Aplasia, PureAdrenal Cortex HormonesCyclophosphamideHumansRetrospective StudiesAdrenal Cortex HormonesCyclophosphamideCyclosporine

Identifiers

PMID37624775
PMCPMC10632686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.