ArticleJAMA network open2023
Sepsis Prediction Model for Determining Sepsis vs SIRS, qSOFA, and SOFA.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of manual sepsis screening in hospitalized adult patients: A systematic review.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Rapid Diagnostics for Distinguishing Bacterial and Viral Infections: A Review of Technologies, Clinical Utility, and Stewardship Implications.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Temporal and cross-site validation of an AI system for self-harm detection.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of Serum Cortisol, DHEA, and SOFA Score in Adult Sepsis Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Clinical Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Sepsis ImmunoScore Predicts Sepsis, Mortality, and Deterioration Better than Clinical Scores and Widely Available Biomarkers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Value of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Combined With Lactate for Early Detection of Sepsis in Prehospital Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- BRD4 modulates antimicrobial defense via non-canonical NRF2 activation in macrophages to confer protection against sepsis.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a predictive model for mortality risk in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Modified SIRS Criteria for Patients ≥ 65 Years with Addition of Altered Mental Status and Reduced Heart Rate for Atrioventricular Nodal Blockers.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Advancing healthcare AI governance through a comprehensive maturity model based on systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Multicenter Prospective Validation of an Updated Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Timing matters: a machine learning-driven comparison of community and hospital-onset sepsis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Comparative Prognostic Performance of qSOFA and SOFA in Emergency Department Patients With Established Septic Shock.Emergency medicine international · 2026Article
- Article
- Interpretable machine learning for postoperative sepsis prediction in ICU patients following intracranial hematoma evacuation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Evidence of immune-metabolic imbalance prior to sepsis: a prospective study in the UK Biobank.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Progress in sepsis prediction models: from traditional scoring systems to multimodal intelligence and clinical translation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The Infectious Diseases Orchestrator: Embracing AI Literacy in the Agentic Era.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram model for 28-day mortality based on IP-10 and clinical parameters in septic patients in the emergency department.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Geographic Validation of the SADFUL Scores for Identifying Bacteremia in the Unscheduled Emergency Department Revisit Cohorts.Emergency medicine international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The Sepsis Prediction Model (SPM) is a proprietary decision support tool created by Epic Systems; it generates a predicting sepsis score (PSS). The model has not undergone validation against existing sepsis prediction tools, such as Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), or quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Asessement (qSOFA). Objective: To assess the validity and timeliness of the SPM compared with SIRS, qSOFA, and SOFA. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included all adults admitted to 5 acute care hospitals in a single US health system between June 5, 2019, and December 31, 2020. Data analysis was conducted from March 2021 to February 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: A sepsis event was defined as receipt of 4 or more days of antimicrobials, blood cultures collected within ±48 hours of initial antimicrobial, and at least 1 organ dysfunction as defined by the organ dysfunction criteria optimized for the electronic health record (eSOFA). Time zero was defined as 15 minutes prior to qualifying antimicrobial or blood culture order. Results: Of 60 507 total admissions, 1663 (2.7%) met sepsis criteria, with 1324 electronic health record-confirmed sepsis (699 [52.8%] male patients; 298 [22.5%] Black patients; 46 [3.5%] Hispanic/Latinx patients; 945 [71.4%] White patients), 339 COVID-19 sepsis (183 [54.0%] male patients; 98 [28.9%] Black patients; 36 [10.6%] Hispanic/Latinx patients; and 189 [55.8%] White patients), and 58 844 (97.3%; 26 632 [45.2%] male patients; 12 698 [21.6%] Black patients; 3367 [5.7%] Hispanic/Latinx patients; 40 491 White patients) did not meet sepsis criteria. The median (IQR) age was 63 (51 to 73) years for electronic health record-confirmed sepsis, 69 (60 to 77) years for COVID-19 sepsis, and 60 (42 to 72) years for nonsepsis admissions. Within the vendor recommended threshold PSS range of 5 to 8, PSS of 8 or greater had the highest balanced accuracy for classifying a sepsis admission at 0.79 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.80). Change in SOFA score of 2 or more had the highest sensitivity, at 0.97 (95% CI, 0.97 to 0.98). At a PSS of 8 or greater, median (IQR) time to score positivity from time zero was 68.00 (6.75 to 605.75) minutes. For SIRS, qSOFA, and SOFA, median (IQR) time to score positivity was 7.00 (-105.00 to 08.00) minutes, 74.00 (-22.25 to 599.25) minutes, and 28.00 (-108.50 to 134.00) minutes, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of hospital admissions, balanced accuracy of the SPM outperformed other models at higher threshold PSS; however, application of the SPM in a clinical setting was limited by poor timeliness as a sepsis screening tool as compared to SIRS and SOFA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.