ArticleSpine deformity2024
Radiographic and clinical outcomes after definitive spine fusion for skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis.
Article in Spine deformity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revision of Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Reasons, Treatments, and Clinical Management with Case Examples.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the intermediate-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of skeletally immature idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients that underwent definitive fusion (DF).
methodsA retrospective review of patients with IS who were Risser 0 with open tri-radiate cartilages at the time of DF with minimum 5-year follow-up. Outcomes included Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-30 scores, major Cobb angle, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and unplanned returns to the operating room (UPROR). Adding-on was defined as progression of the major Cobb angle > 5° or tilt of the lowest instrumented vertebra > 5°.
resultsThirty-two patients (78% female, mean age 12.2 ± 1.3 years old, mean preoperative major Cobb 64.8° ± 15.9) were included. Of these patients, 20 (62.5%) experienced adding-on and 6 (18.8%) required a revision surgery to correct their progressive spinal deformity. Adding-on was associated with lower 5-year postoperative SRS scores for appearance (3.7 ± 0.7 vs 4.4 ± 0.3, p = 0.0126), mental health (4.2 ± 0.6 vs 4.6 ± 0.3, p = 0.0464), satisfaction with treatment (4.0 ± 0.8 vs 4.7 ± 0.4, p = 0.0140), and total score (4.0 ± 0.4 vs 4.4 ± 0.2, p = 0.0035). The results of the PFTs did not differ between groups. Patients experienced an average of 0.53 UPROR/patient.
conclusionDF in skeletally immature patients results in a high rate of adding-on, which adversely affects Health-Related Quality of Life. However, reoperation rates, both planned and unplanned, remain lower when compared to patients undergoing growth-friendly treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.