Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37624422›Full record

Observational studyLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023

A comparison between real-time intraoperative voice dictation and the operative report in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter prospective observational study.

Özgür Eryigit, Floyd W van de Graaf, Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs, Meindert N Sosef, Eelco J R de Graaf, Anand G Menon, Marilyne M Lange, Johan F Lange

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Özgür EryigitDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Internal Postal Address H-173, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. o.eryigit@erasmusmc.nl.
Floyd W van de GraafDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Internal Postal Address H-173, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Vincent B NieuwenhuijsDepartment of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Meindert N SosefDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen and Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Eelco J R de GraafDepartment of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle Aan Den IJssel, the Netherlands.
Anand G MenonDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Internal Postal Address H-173, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marilyne M LangeDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Johan F LangeDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Internal Postal Address H-173, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLIJsselland Ziekenhuis · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLIsala · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe current operative report often inadequately reflects events occurring during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The addition of intraoperative video recording to the operative report has already proven to add important information. It was hypothesized that real-time intraoperative voice dictation (RIVD) can provide an equal or more complete overview of the operative procedure compared to the narrative operative report (NR) produced postoperatively.

methodsSONAR is a multicenter prospective observational trial, conducted at four surgical centers in the Netherlands. Elective LCs of patients aged 18 years and older were included. Participating surgeons were requested to dictate the essential steps of LC during surgery. RIVDs and NRs were reviewed according to the stepwise LC guideline of the Dutch Society for Surgery. The cumulative adequacy rates for RIVDs were compared with those of the postoperatively written NR.

results79 of 90 cases were eligible for inclusion and available for further analysis. RIVD resulted in a significantly higher adequacy rate compared to NR for the circumferential dissection of the cystic duct and artery (NR 32.5% vs. RIVD 61.0%, P = 0.016). NR had higher adequacy rates in reporting the transection of the cystic duct (NR 100% vs. RIVD 77.9%, P =  < 0.001) and the removal of the gallbladder from the liver bed (NR 98.7% vs. RIVD 68.8%, P < 0.001). The total adequacy was not significantly different between the two reporting methods (NR 78.0% vs. RIVD 76.4%, P = 1.00).

conclusionOverall, the adequacy of RIVD is comparable to the postoperatively written NR in reporting surgical steps in LC. However, the most essential surgical step, the circumferential dissection of the cystic duct and artery, was reported more adequately in RIVD.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicArteriesDissectionHumansLiverMargins of ExcisionLaparoscopic cholecystectomyOperative reportingPatient safetyVoice dictation

Identifiers

PMID37624422
PMCPMC10457217
OpenAlexW4386153998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.