ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Five machine learning-based radiomics models for preoperative prediction of histological grade in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable deep learning framework based on contrast-enhanced MRI for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Radiomics with Ultrasound Radiofrequency Data for Improving Evaluation of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Nomogram-based prognostic stratification for patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma: a population study of SEER database and a Chinese cohort.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the efficacy of radiomics models via five machine learning algorithms in predicting the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before surgery and to develop the most stable model to classify high-risk HCC patients.
methodsContrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images of 175 HCC patients before surgery were analysed, and radiomics features were extracted from CECT images (including arterial and portal phases). Five machine learning models, including Bayes, random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), logistic regression (LR), and support vector machine (SVM), were applied to establish the model. The stability of the five models was weighed by the relative standard deviation (RSD), and the lowest RSD value was chosen as the most stable model to predict the histological grade of HCC. The area under the curve (AUC) and Delong tests were devoted to assessing the predictive efficacy of the models.
resultsHigh-grade HCC accounted for 28.57% (50/175) of the 175 patients. The RSD value of AUC via the RF machine learning model was the lowest (2.3%), followed by Bayes (3.2%), KNN (6.4%), SVM (8.7%) and LR (31.3%). In addition, the RF model (AUC = 0.995) was better than the other four models in the training set (p < 0.05), as well as obtained good predictive performance in the test set (AUC = 0.837).
conclusionAmong the five machine learning models, the RF-based radiomics model was the most stable and performed excellently in identifying high histological grade of HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.