Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37624395›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Five machine learning-based radiomics models for preoperative prediction of histological grade in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Cuiyun Wu, Xingyue Du, Yang Zhang, Li Zhu, Junfa Chen, Yuan Chen, Yuguo Wei, Yang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cuiyun WuCancer Center, Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital),, Hangzhou Medical College, 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xingyue DuBengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Yang ZhangCancer Center, Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital),, Hangzhou Medical College, 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Li ZhuCancer Center, Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Junfa ChenCancer Center, Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital),, Hangzhou Medical College, 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yuan ChenCancer Center, Department of Pathology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yuguo WeiPrecision Health Institution, General Electric Healthcare, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yang LiuCancer Center, Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. liuyang1@hmc.edu.cn.

Funding

Cuiyun Wu 2020KY019Li Zhu 2023KY485Yang Liu LTGY23H180018, 2021PY036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the efficacy of radiomics models via five machine learning algorithms in predicting the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before surgery and to develop the most stable model to classify high-risk HCC patients.

methodsContrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images of 175 HCC patients before surgery were analysed, and radiomics features were extracted from CECT images (including arterial and portal phases). Five machine learning models, including Bayes, random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), logistic regression (LR), and support vector machine (SVM), were applied to establish the model. The stability of the five models was weighed by the relative standard deviation (RSD), and the lowest RSD value was chosen as the most stable model to predict the histological grade of HCC. The area under the curve (AUC) and Delong tests were devoted to assessing the predictive efficacy of the models.

resultsHigh-grade HCC accounted for 28.57% (50/175) of the 175 patients. The RSD value of AUC via the RF machine learning model was the lowest (2.3%), followed by Bayes (3.2%), KNN (6.4%), SVM (8.7%) and LR (31.3%). In addition, the RF model (AUC = 0.995) was better than the other four models in the training set (p < 0.05), as well as obtained good predictive performance in the test set (AUC = 0.837).

conclusionAmong the five machine learning models, the RF-based radiomics model was the most stable and performed excellently in identifying high histological grade of HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsAlgorithmsBayes TheoremHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesHepatocellular carcinomaMachine learningNeoplasm gradingRadiomicsRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID37624395
PMCPMC11796754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.