Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37624376›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nutrition2023

The effects of substituting red and processed meat for mycoprotein on biomarkers of cardiovascular risk in healthy volunteers: an analysis of secondary endpoints from Mycomeat.

Dominic N Farsi, Jose Lara Gallegos, Tim J A Finnigan, William Cheung, Jose Munoz Munoz, Daniel M Commane

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03944421 (The Effects of Replacing Red and Processed Meat With Quorn on Markers of Gastrointestinal Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03944421 nacompletednot on this map

The Effects of Replacing Red and Processed Meat With Quorn on Markers of Gastrointestinal Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthumbria UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsRed and Processed Meat, Quorn
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dominic N FarsiApplied and Health Sciences, University of Northumbria, Sutherland Building, Ellison Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK. dominic.farsi@teagasc.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8077-8140
Jose Lara GallegosApplied and Health Sciences, University of Northumbria, Sutherland Building, Ellison Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.
Tim J A FinniganMarlow Foods, Stokesley, TS9 7AB, UK.
William CheungApplied and Health Sciences, University of Northumbria, Sutherland Building, Ellison Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.
Jose Munoz MunozApplied and Health Sciences, University of Northumbria, Sutherland Building, Ellison Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.
Daniel M CommaneApplied and Health Sciences, University of Northumbria, Sutherland Building, Ellison Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.
Northumbria University · GBQuorn (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMycoprotein is a relatively novel food source produced from the biomass of Fusarium venenatum. It has previously been shown to improve CVD risk markers in intervention trials when it is compared against total meat. It has not hitherto been assessed specifically for benefits relative to red and processed meat.

methodsWe leveraged samples from Mycomeat, an investigator-blind randomised crossover controlled trial in metabolically healthy male adults (n = 20), randomised to consume 240 g/day of red and processed meat for 14 days followed by mycoprotein, or vice versa. Blood biochemical indices were a priori defined secondary endpoints.

resultsMycoprotein consumption led to a 6.74% reduction in total cholesterol (P = 0.02) and 12.3% reduction in LDL cholesterol (P = 0.02) from baseline values. Change in fasted triglycerides was not significantly different between diets (+ 0.19 ± 0.11 mmol/l with mycoprotein, P = 0.09). There was a small but significant reduction in waist circumference for mycoprotein relative to meat (- 0.95 ± 0.42 cm, P = 0.04). Following the mycoprotein diet, mean systolic (- 2.41 ± 1.89 mmHg, P = 0.23) and diastolic blood pressure (- 0.80 ± 1.23 mmHg, P = 0.43) were reduced from baseline. There were no statistically significant effects of the intervention on urinary sodium, nitrite or TMAO; while urinary potassium (+ 126.12 ± 50.30 mmol/l, P = 0.02) and nitrate (+ 2.12 ± 0.90 mmol/l, P = 0.04) were both significantly higher with mycoprotein relative to meat. The study population comprised metabolically healthy adults, therefore, changes in plasma lipids had little effect on cardiovascular risk scores (- 0.34% FRS for mycoprotein P = 0.24).

conclusionsThese results confirm potential cardiovascular benefits when displacing red and processed meat with mycoprotein in the diet. Longer trials in higher risk study populations are needed to fully elucidate suggested benefits for blood pressure and body composition. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT03944421.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesRed MeatAdultBiomarkersCholesterol, HDLCross-Over StudiesHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleMeatRisk FactorsBiomarkersCholesterol, HDLCardiometabolicFibreFungal glucanMeat alternativesMeat replacementMycoproteinPlant-based

Identifiers

PMID37624376
PMCPMC10611638
OpenAlexW4386153152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.